40

Sounds like this possible, expanded trade war would be more brutal for US consumers than for China. Snip:

Since Trump is expected to impose tariffs worldwide, this will only help China find willing buyers of its relatively cheaper products. Thus, Beijing will have a much less hard time finding new buyers than policymakers and media analysts in the US seem to believe at the moment. Despite the ‘trade war’ started by Trump and maintained by Biden, China’s total contribution to global exports is 17 per cent, up from 12 per cent during the first Trump presidency.

Where are these exports going? Of course, to the rest of the world. In the coming months, China will be keen to expand it even further in the Global South. Chinese giant Electric Vehicle makes, BYD, recently began its operations in Pakistan. This is just one example of a much broader pattern laying well beyond Washington’s capacity to hit and stall.

Therefore, while the Trump administration can start its ‘trade war 2.0.’, there is little denying that its immediate brutal impact will fall equally on US consumers, who will be forced to buy much more expensive products. Unlike the US, Beijing has already taken steps to help its people increase consumption, which will help offset the impact on exports. China’s recently unveiled US$1.4 trillion package is a key step that would help local governments deal with debts and consequently allow consumers to spend more. Increased domestic consumption means less reliance on exports in the long run. Beijing, in other words, is ready for the war. There are no indications that the US government and consumers are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] miz@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

brutal for the US

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

news

23685 readers
631 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS