21
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

russia is the correct and only answer.

ukraine was literally no threat to russia. no 'western' or european nation is a threat to russia if russia would just gtfo and quit invading its neighbors.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

ukraine is not a threat to anyone, but the united states is and ukraine let the united states fool it into thinking they could join the american side despite geopolitical hazards like russia and trump or warning signs from history like latin american; the middle east; or europe after ww2.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

NATO encroachment is a threat to Russia.

[-] commander@lemmings.world -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not really.

It's a threat to Putin, who is the greatest threat to Russia.

Just look at how many Russians are dead for his war.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago

Take a look at Libya to see what happens when NATO helps depose the leader.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Russia is the correct and only answer only if you're utterly clueless of history and geopolitics.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club -4 points 3 days ago
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago

Oops. what's this?

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/us-russia-nato/

https://natowatch.org/newsbriefs/2018/how-gorbachev-was-misled-over-assurances-against-nato-expansion

https://truthout.org/articles/us-approach-to-ukraine-and-russia-has-left-the-domain-of-rational-discourse/

https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk_agreements

50 prominent foreign policy experts (former senators, military officers, diplomats, etc.) sent an open letter to Clinton outlining their opposition to NATO expansion back in 1997:

George Kennan, arguably America's greatest ever foreign policy strategist, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy warned that NATO expansion was a "tragic mistake" that ought to ultimately provoke a "bad reaction from Russia" back in 1998.

Jack F. Matlock Jr., US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat [...] since the Soviet Union collapsed"

[-] commander@lemmings.world -5 points 3 days ago

Whatever happened to NATO’s guarantee for Ukraine’s security if they got rid of their nukes?

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
21 points (74.4% liked)

World News

33428 readers
598 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS