1012
submitted 2 months ago by Cat@ponder.cat to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

"Definitely never seen this type of response to a FOIA request," quipped one journalist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not entirely true.

All these firings are likely going to result in classaction lawsuits, and the judiciary (so far) has been very responsive to Trump's power grabs. You'll recall they shut him down on DOGE's Treasury incursion, birthright citizenship, and the funding freeze. (Among others)

It may seem like everything's fucked up, but that's only because your social media feed and executive orders create chaos faster than the judiciary can check it.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago

All these firings are likely going to result in classaction lawsuits, and the judiciary (so far) has been very responsive to Trump’s power grabs. You’ll recall they shut him down on DOGE’s Treasury incursion, birthright citizenship, and the funding freeze. (Among others)

Yeah, good luck with that in 2-4 years, when those lawsuits pan out. And then they get appealed to the Supreme Court, where the GOP-majority lapdogs say "yessir" and rule in favor of chaos.

We couldn't even get Trump convicted of criminal charges in time. What makes you think the judiciary is going to save us?

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

GOP-majority lapdogs say “yessir”

Historically speaking, on some issues yes, and on some issues no.

They weren't a rubber stamp in his first term, most notably on health care, but we'll see. The culture's different now and no one can really say how the lawsuits will go, but SCOTUS can't take every case that's going to come through.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You may want a more recent news update before you claim the judiciary has been responsive. Judge Tanya Chutkan, the same one who ruled against insurrection charges "because we don't prosecute sitting presidents", just blocked the multi-state lawsuit requesting DOGE be restrained.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/politics/doge-temporary-restraining-order-chutkan/index.html

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yep, I know.

Doesn't change facts. The judiciary is, by and large, clocking these unconstitutional power grabs. It just takes time, and you all are doomscrolling and pretending checks and balances no longer apply despite the abundant display to the contrary.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The judiciary has entered temporary restraining orders. No one has declared his power grab straight out illegal yet.

And when they do he’ll just ignore it. The courts are dogs with no teeth.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
1012 points (99.7% liked)

Not The Onion

16163 readers
321 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS