18
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Mangione, 26, appeared in court wearing a green cable knit sweater over a white shirt. He was brought into the courtroom in leg and arm shackles and wearing a bulletproof vest.

Theater to make him look like a villain that people want to shoot at.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Lol they said that and my first thought was, "what, is there a risk of some billionaire CEO bursting into the courtroom to exact revenge?"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

absolutely not. The federal charges have the death penalty attached.

Remember, the rich fucks need this to end. They certainly don't want us getting ideas. And the fastest way to do that would be to have him wind up dead before they can drag his name through the mud in a show trial. that would turn him into a martyr.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Killing this guy is a very good way to piss off a lot of poor people who like him. The rich fucks need this to end in a relatively short prison sentence

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

he's gonna get eptsteined after the convictions blow over

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

His estate is rich enough to hire a hitman... Not that I think it would happen also not that I think that their precautions would prevent that...

[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

It doesn't even need to be his estate. UHC could easily do it

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

They prefer the more indirect method of killing people

[-] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

He should complain that the vest is restrictive and that he can't breathe.

[-] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 1 month ago

Great idea, cry wolf so that people who really can't breathe are ignored.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

The guy he killed was someone we would grow to hate. He isn't like JFK who was extremely popular at the time.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Allegedly. Guy doesnt even look like the pictured guy

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I think so, too. Enough of a reason to have a shadow of a doubt, therefore a legit acquittal

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Does the court decide that he has to wear the vest, or was that a decision by his team? I know the shackles are typically requested by the court, but my understanding is that the rest of a defendant's wardrobe is their own decision.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 1 month ago

Being in police custody, means they are legally responsible for his health and safety.
They can require something like a vest on those grounds.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

So you're saying they have a vested interest in his health?

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Sort of, if he is hurt or dies they are responsible for it.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago
[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

I'll figure it out eventually!

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I figured it out! It wasnt as funny as I expected! Probably my fault!

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

These things never live up to the expectations. It was just a dumb joke.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago
[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's weird that they don't have a little too outside of the courtroom to take it off. A vestibule, perhaps?

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

News

28482 readers
2797 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS