64

The NWT government and city of Yellowknife are describing in tweets, Instagram messages etc. how to search key evacuation information on CPAC and CBC. The broadcast carriers have a duty to carry emergency information, but Meta and X are blocking links.

While internet access is reportedly limited in Yellowknife, residents are finding this a barrier to getting current and accurate information. Even links to CBC radio are blocked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know nearly enough about those court cases, international law, or treaties between the USA and Canada to say anything specific. But my general point is that ultimately Canada has a military and Facebook doesn't. Facebook can't do anything on Canadian territory unless the Canadian government permits it, and that includes refusing to comply with judicial decisions.

Canada makes the rules. Facebook just chooses whether to accept them or to leave.

(Even if Facebook had no physical presence in Canada or in any country that had relevant treaties with Canada, Canada could still order its ISPs and payment processors to block Facebook. However, Facebook does have offices in Canada so this is a moot point.)

True. But Meta hasn’t left as yet.

And there are users here suggesting that the Canadian government shouldn’t be attempting to legislate or regulate Meta.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Should" can mean several different things in this context.

Is Canada capable of enforcing its legislation/regulation? Yes.

Does Canada have the moral right to legislate/regulate? Almost always yes. (I would say no if Canada just seized all of Facebook's property for no reason, but no one is proposing anything like that.)

Is it in practice a good idea for Canada to legislate/regulate? Maybe yes but maybe no, just like with any legislation/regulation.

Does it make sense for Canadians be surprised or offended if Facebook doesn't break the law but also doesn't cooperate with the intent of the legislation/regulation? Here's where I'm saying "no".

I don't consider myself evil, but If I were running Facebook, I would ask the experts working for me whether it was more profitable to pay Canadian news agencies or to stop letting Canadian people post links to news (keeping in mind that if Facebook pays Canadian news agencies, other countries will start demanding the same thing for their news agencies). The I would do whatever those experts said was going to be more profitable. My job wouldn't be to do what's best for Canada; it would be to do what's best for Facebook while complying with Canadian law. (In the same way that as a private citizen, I do what's best for me while complying with the law, not necessarily what's best for the government or for the nation.)

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
64 points (94.4% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
767 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS