540
we all made it a long time ago
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
540 points (98.2% liked)
Microblog Memes
7242 readers
893 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Hm, when I say owning a second home I don't mean building a second home. I strictly mean owning a second estate. I don't see how buying an existing estate to rent it out has anything to do with climate. It's just an investment to buy it and rent it out, even without planning on it increasing in value.
Don't farm people. It's a home not a financial instrument. If you want riches produce something of value. In that scenario you're just jamming yourself between someone and their basic need for shelter with your hand out. A different problem than climate change to be sure, but problematic all the same.
Hm I don't know man. I'm not a landlord, I don't even own a home. But I see renting as a useful service. Do landlords and estate companies abuse people? Absolutely. But I don't see renting as evil per se. Buying a house/flat is a huge personal investment and risk, and I'm happy to rent for the time being until I'm ready to buy.
We could have co-op's, instead we have profits. I wish you all the luck in buying your own home. But for me, where I'm at, I will forever pay rent to never own anything. Forever a second class citizen. All these apartments I've lived in with rents calculated not by necessity, but by what the market will bear. I'm pissed, and I think you should be too.
Your problem is with capitalism, not landlords.
The landlord would be the capitalist in this scenario, no?
Everyone is, some are just in better positions than others.
To me, this very much seems like a "don't hate the player, hate the game" type of situation. It's like companies not paying their "fair" share of taxes - they're just following the laws. It's up to us to change them if we don't like it, just like the issue of having soulless corporations as landlords.
That's fair