438
omg
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
What if I told you that it works for any number ๐ฅ you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ ๐ฅโ0)
... where x is positive.
Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
Nope, it still works even then.
NOW I get it. Thanks.