view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
I'm not sure what the catch is here. I'm guessing it has to do with drug patents being owned by different companies in different countries.
I'm sure there will be cutouts for companies that do favors or whatever. Just like everything else he's doing.
How would this actually be enforced? Unlike other countries with socialized healthcare, the US doesn't negotiate prices with these companies directly. Perhaps there's some mechanism I don't know of, but I doubt it, we're kind of all about empowering capitalists to fuck people over.
The bigger catch is that this would almost certainly go to the supreme court and get overturned.
Medicare has to buy drugs
You're right, but if Trump does medicare for all and orders prices be fixed, all through one executive order, I think the bourgeois would actually kill him.
E: Also he just won't do this lol, it's Trump after all.
Monkey's paw it's for drug wholesalers on import prices but just so their profit margins increase one billion percent when prices to end users stay the same.
I'm kinda trying to unpack it too.
I don't really understand enough about healthcare in different countries (I'm in Australia).
Meds in the US are stupid expensive because of freedom or something. In Australia all meds are purchased by a central organisation so they have bargaining power.
IDK all the factors involved in negotiating a price, but presumably Australia has some cards to play like buying adjacent meds from non-US vendors.
What I mean is, US vendors would already be extracting as much from Australia as they reasonably can, and an EO from POTUS doesn't really change the factors that are balancing the market.
Another issue is ethics. HIV antiretrovirals are very expensive in Australia, suppose $1,000 USD per month. That's fine, the government pays for that. The countries that have crazy high rates of HIV generally have a much lower GDP per capita, it's just unethical to withhold medication from them when the cost to manufacture a month's supply is $1.
Finally I suspect it's simply the usual supply / demand type factors. A company can make more profit by selling 10 million doses at $1 than they can selling 0 doses at $100.
As usual, it's a poorly considered blunt instrument expected to address a complex and nuanced issue. It makes sense to Trump because it's grandiose and logical within the confines of his adversarial transactional paradigm.
In practice though, I suspect that American pharmaceutical producers aren't happy about this, and if it does have any effect on prices for impoverished countries it will put a lot of pressure on other countries to respect the intellectual property rights on those meds.