161
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by edge@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

I don't think modern missiles can be intercepted though, no?

[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

that's what this program is seeking to change.

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A missile-intercepting missile has to be many times more maneuverable than its target missile...

And if you can make an interceptor that maneuverable, then you can also make a warhead missile with (nearly) the same maneuverability...

I don't see how it's feasible without being 100 years ahead of your adversary in missile technology.

Edit: Unless this tech is real. posadas shrek-blob begone

Edit2: Okay, it's a little more complicated than that, because of the three "missile phases". I see.

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A missile interception scheme doesn't have to work (and it won't, total pipe dream) to ruin MAD, it just has to convince the bloodthirsty maniacs in charge that it works.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
161 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13836 readers
777 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS