view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
I get what you are saying, but there is a huge flaw in your logic here. You are treating military ventures, particularly WWII military ventures, as if they have a quality assurance team with statistically controlled practices and a feedback mechanism that allows them to make adjustments and understand what they are doing, or why it is effective or ineffective, or if it the effect justifies the costs. They did not, and to some degree, still don't.
The U.S. still hadn't even figured out by WWII that it is a really good idea to have troops stationed behind the front lines when pushing on an offensive in order to regroup scattered soldiers, which left multiple divisions scattered on offensive thrusts and lead to the infamous moments like what was portrayed in "A Bridge Too Far" or in the Hurtgen Forest, a mistake that they literally repeated from WWI in the Aragonne Forest. In that vein, they did multiple troop air drops, which which have repeatedly and soundly been shown to be ineffective at best, and completely wipe out a combat unit at worst, despite what Hollywood and video games would have you believe, because of what military planners thought, which was mostly that it seemed bad ass.
The bombings absolutely caused chaos in Germany and took their toll on the population, but their actual effect on German industrial production was relatively limited in hindsight, especially when compared to the bombing campaigns in things like the Second Gulf War. It is unclear if it could have been considered an effective campaign from that measure. But generals love their planes and destroying civilian infrastructure, and bombers and jets are admittedly pretty cool to look at and watch fly.