85
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago

Over 80 chemicals!

What bullshit scaremongering is this? There's like 80 chemicals in a banana. Some of them are even radioactive!

[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 16 points 1 day ago

There are even over 100,000 distinct chemicals in a banana. Probably over 1M. Horrified whenever I see somebody eat one. Only plastic food pellets for me please.

[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

That's almost fair. The difference is: a banana is a living organism, and very few synthetic materials are supposed to have 80 differently-identifiable chemicals in them. This melange of death here is shit like dioxins, plasticizers, decomposition products, dyes and other additives, as well as the reaction products of all of THAT shit mixing at high temp in the melted plastic. If you aren't afraid, then I don't know how to help you, child.

Brushing this off with some trite banana comparison is just making a Robert Kehoe out of yourself.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago

a banana is a living organism

So what? So is poison ivy. I wouldn't recommend eating it.

very few synthetic materials are supposed to have 80 differently-identifiable chemicals in them

I'm sorry but - what the fuck are you talking about? Who is deciding how many different chemicals should be in any given material? What sort of of ridiculousness is this?

This melange of death here is shit like dioxins, plasticizers, decomposition products, dyes and other additives, as well as the reaction products of all of THAT shit mixing at high temp in the melted plastic.

Which is my point - the NUMBER of items in a given material is just scare-mongering BS. The actual ingredients is what matters.

If you aren’t afraid, then I don’t know how to help you, child.

If you don't understand that the count of the number of chemicals in a thing doesn't relate to that thing's toxicity then I can't help you either kid.

[-] notastatist@feddit.org 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I dont know why you got downvoted, you are very right!

"We identified common plastics chemicals, including UV-stabilizers and plasticizers, as well as chemicals that are not used as plastics additives, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals and biocides. These may have contaminated the plastics during their first use phase, prior to becoming waste and being recycled."

[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Just people deciding that divorcing a statement from its context (plastics manufacturing) is sufficient to say that no alarm need be raised. As I said: Robert Kehoe.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
85 points (85.7% liked)

Science

4696 readers
195 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS