79
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)
news
24170 readers
514 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
what the fuck does that mean
I think the redditor above wants to use political chatbots as busyboxes, that quarantines the most annoying people on the internet into their own little self-contained communities.
Idk if I'm just not capable of parsing this or something, but I still don't understand what exactly you mean, but for the fedditor's post above I haven't been able to decipher a single phrase of that second sentence.
What I got from it was something like "I'd rather have AIs discuss exhausting political topics rather than humans"
Like train a bunch of AIs to have political conversations, load then all on a server and then bury them somewhere. A better way of saying it would be "if these conversations are necessary, I'd rather if AIs could have them with one another instead of bothering humans."
I don't know why the poster thought this would be a popular sentiment on a website based around humans talking about politics (and shit and cum)
It's grillpillism I think. Let the LLMs jabber about politics so the human beings can ponder loftier notions? I dunno.
Mixed with some horseshoe theory.
That seems like the first sentence of the post, I agree. But who the fuck are "agents" in the second sentence?
Idk why I'm acting like this is some ancient text that needs deciphered. The fedditor could just reply maybe with clarification lol. But by then I might not care anymore what the answer is
Agents are another name for preprogrammed? LLM instances, as far as I know. So the automated AI helpdesk/chatbot that many websites have begun using, for example.
As far as the general gist of their comment, I agree with your parent comment.