76
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
76 points (98.7% liked)
news
24588 readers
597 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Honestly I am more surprised that Russia hasn't been more proactive already in striking "western interests", but let's hope something comes of this. I am wondering where exactly the Russians plan to strike, if at all. Within Europe? Or the middle east? Or maybe even in Africa?
Putin knows that striking a "western interests" could easily spiral out of control. Russians know first hand what an existential war entails, it's nothing to be taken lightly. Amerikkkans have an entirely different view of world wars, they've never experienced a world war fought on their own soil. They've always been safe on their homeland and in recent times they can even view the action live streamed like its a video game. Even current US soldiers don't really know what a war against a peer competitor is really like. Plenty of American "volunteers" to Ukraine can't believe that fighting Russia is not the same as Irag.
Probably in Western Ukraine. Russia does not have the capability to strike anywhere in the world whenever they want (they don’t have 800 bases on every continent)
Hi. I understand why you said what you said because your talking about a conventional air strike, but i feel to need to remind you that Russia most certainly does have the ability to strike anywhere on the world whenever they want. They have thousands if ICBMs which are capable of hitting any location on earth, and impossible to block reliably.
It's important we remember this because the west like to act as though them poking Russia has no real potential consequences, and it could literally end the world if they take it too far.
Yes you are right about ICBMs. I was talking in the context of conventional strikes.
I think something people forget too is while ICBMs are largely thought of as nuclear weapons there no reason they HAVE to be. The same delivery systems could be used for conventional weapons it just usually isnt worth the cost. But it might be for extremely tactically important targets that are far enough away. Especially if you already have thousands of them like Russia does.
The problem is that you would have no way of knowing if it’s a nuclear strike or not. ICBMs will trigger MAD even if they are actually non nuclear.
I get why you might think that, but that same argument can be made about the missiles Ukraine has been shooting into Russia that were provided by the US. They're perfectly capable of carrying a nuke, and Russia would have no way to know until it hits. So from Russia's perspective we are already in the realm of playing with MAD. They have no reason not to do the same thing.
Also edit to add even IF it was confirmed to be a nuke Russa was launching if they target somewhere like Poland for example it's very unlikely the US would launch their own nukes in that case. They're not gonna risk the US mainland to save Poland. So when it comes to hitting non-nuclear NATO nations with ICBMs using conventional payloads its really just up to Russia if they want to try. MAD doesn't work at all in that case.
yeah you could maybe do one that's too small to be a nuke but at that point how much damage is it gonna do and you're putting a shitload of trust in everyone else to identify that it can't be a nuke
An non-nuclear ICBM strike would effectively destroy MAD since you can't determine what is and isn't a nuclear strike. Do a couple conventional salvos, then make one of them nuclear. Take out two legs of the triad then focus on defending against the subs in a retaliation strike.
Exactly, there's a reason that civilian space agencies worldwide are very careful about notifying other governments about launch schedules and planned trajectories.
See the use of the Hazel IRBM in Ukraine, back in November of '24