281

submitted 1 day ago by A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous."

I didn't read it that way at all. Their argument sounds more like "there's nuance that you're glossing over."

It seems that we all agree PFAS are generally nasty chemicals, some worse than others. Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) is just one of the "nicer" ones.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 21 hours ago

You can't make teflon without the PFAS though. It's like saying AIDS is completely different than HIV

[-] 9bananas@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago

no it's more like saying "desalinated water is fine, it's the brine that's problematic."

which is true.

and the same goes for teflon:

the PFAS are toxic, not teflon itself.

glossing over that distinction is disingenuous...

yes, you can't make one without the other, true, but the end product is not toxic. that's an important difference you can't just ignore in order to say teflon is toxic, because a requisite material in (cheap) production is toxic.

because that's like saying desalinated water is toxic, just because brine is toxic..which is obviously ridiculous.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful