242
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

Nylon? To many things end with on.

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 9 points 9 hours ago

funnily enough, that is a DuPont thing, but hasn't find its way into everyone's blood yet.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

that is a DuPont thing, but hasn't find its way into everyone's blood yet.

Umm.. I've some bad news for you.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024003374

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 4 points 2 hours ago

welp, guess this meme is even more true then.

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah, that's why I chose it haha.

Edit: I was just being salty in my original comment due to the meme being to vague and me being a chemist.

I'm not from the states but actually got to visit the DuPont plant that did nylon and Lycra. Also saw the river that once changed colour or something due to waste chemicals? I can't remember the story.

Regardless, I in no way support DuPont or any other company that is responsible for such damages as they have caused.

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

You're just not trying hard enough, it took me a while but i managed to jam it in there (very little room in my veins because of all the microplastics)

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Now do it with Lycra.

[-] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Except that they used the chemicals that do find their way into everyone's blood to make nylon. So it tangentially fits the meme.

[-] Nikls94@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Watermelon?

[-] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 41 points 13 hours ago

Crayon 💀

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Does Teflon explain MAGA?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Nah, I'm betting on plain old lead.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 43 points 16 hours ago
[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 60 points 16 hours ago
[-] SW42@lemmy.world 39 points 14 hours ago

Teflon is just the brand name. I believe it’s called Polytetrafluorethylene, thus ending in ne :)

[-] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 29 points 13 hours ago
[-] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

SW42 shall forever be remembered a hero, who saved the world from a dark path

[-] Tja@programming.dev 25 points 16 hours ago

Teflon itself is quite good, getting it to stick to places is the problem.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 34 points 15 hours ago

Quite good, if you avoid the fact it's literally everywhere including the atmosphere, doesn't break down, and causes cancer. But who cares about such little things like cancer causing rain...

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 2 points 2 hours ago

Teflon, on it's own is safe, the problem are the chemicals used to produce it.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Teflon itself is inert, but it's also not needed to avoid that food sticks in a pan. In a good prepared Steel pan food sticks less than in a Teflon pan and is way more resistant to damages. The food sticks in the pan, if you don't wait to add the food until it's heated enough, not for other reasons, mistake often don by normal users. Professional cooks never use Teflon pans.

Preparing a Steel pan non-stick

  • Clean the pan after buy it
  • Heat the pan on the kitchen
  • Add some oil and heat somewhat more until it smoke
  • After this, wait until i's cold enough and distribute and eliminate the oil film over the whole surface with an kitchen paper.
  • Done

After this, to fry something, add a little oil and wait until the oil has enough heat (test with the handle of a wood spoon, if it forms little bubbles on it in the oil, the temperature is OK), to add the food. It will never stick this way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXEt-fhyCis

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago

Teflon itself is inert

About that

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

Steel/iron > teflon for sure though.

[-] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 24 points 15 hours ago

Again, that's from getting it to stick to things. The smaller PTFE chemicals that make it possible to suspend Teflon in water are the problem.

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 31 points 13 hours ago

Teflon is the brand name for for the chemical Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Making PTFE requires PFAS, which are the toxic part. Think of PFAS as little bits of chain varying lengths that get strung together to make the larger PTFE molecule.

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous." PFAS contaminated water being released to the environment is an unavoidable by produce of making Teflon. You can only make Teflon as a solid without suspending the PFAS in water first.

Here's a pretty good video about the history, manufacturing process, and toxicity.

https://youtu.be/SC2eSujzrUY

[-] Rednax@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

There is one important note: you won't get cancer from the Teflon in your pans. You get it from the PFAS used to produce the pans. This means you don't have to throw out all your pans, as if they were made from lead and asbestos. Just make sure not to buy new ones with Teflon.

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous."

I didn't read it that way at all. Their argument sounds more like "there's nuance that you're glossing over."

It seems that we all agree PFAS are generally nasty chemicals, some worse than others. Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) is just one of the "nicer" ones.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 11 hours ago

You can't make teflon without the PFAS though. It's like saying AIDS is completely different than HIV

[-] 9bananas@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

no it's more like saying "desalinated water is fine, it's the brine that's problematic."

which is true.

and the same goes for teflon:

the PFAS are toxic, not teflon itself.

glossing over that distinction is disingenuous...

yes, you can't make one without the other, true, but the end product is not toxic. that's an important difference you can't just ignore in order to say teflon is toxic, because a requisite material in (cheap) production is toxic.

because that's like saying desalinated water is toxic, just because brine is toxic..which is obviously ridiculous.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

It's also what makes it cheap. Making Teflon other ways is much more expensive.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It's releasing a high amount of micro and nano plastics, and those are linked to different health issues including cancer.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724027232

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

[-] Tja@programming.dev -5 points 14 hours ago

Teflon doesn't cause cancer.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 5 points 13 hours ago

It's releasing a high amount of micro and nano plastics, and those are linked to different health issues including cancer.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724027232

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

[-] Tja@programming.dev -2 points 12 hours ago

Oxidative stress and inflammation is cancer?

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

At least 40% of human cancers are associated with aberrant ERK pathway activity (ERKp).

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00554-5

ERK expression is critical for development and their hyperactivation plays a major role in cancer development and progression.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7027163/

Prolonged oxidative stress contributes to cancer initiation and progression through several biological mechanisms.

https://biologyinsights.com/oxidative-stress-and-cancer-whats-the-connection/

Oxidative stress, characterized by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within cells, plays a critical role in the development of cancer by affecting genomic stability and signaling pathways within the cellular microenvironment.

https://biosignaling.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12964-023-01398-5

Inflammation predisposes to the development of cancer and promotes all stages of tumorigenesis.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6831096/

[-] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 8 hours ago

So as much as breathing, coffee and the sun cause cancer?

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago

I mean, it might... but we haven't shown it does.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 14 hours ago

teflon itself is proved safe. its production is what's causing all the problems.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

I had a waterproofing spray that said on it "Completely nontoxic ^when ^dry"

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 14 hours ago

Modern teflon, sure.

But there's a reason its no longer made with PFOA.

Studies have looked at cancer rates in people living near or working in PFOA-related chemical plants. Some of these studies have suggested an increased risk of testicular cancer and kidney cancer with increased PFOA exposure. Studies have also suggested a possible link to thyroid cancer, but the increases in risk have been small and could have been due to chance. - Source

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 15 hours ago

In Denmark there was until very recently a factory doing something with teflon. That shit got launched out the chimney and just rained down everywhere.

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago
[-] FlordaMan@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

Nah, Dupont invoiced everyone.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 14 hours ago

monsanto tactics

[-] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, every factory that does "something" with Teflon probably wants to stick it to things, which are the problematic chemicals, not Teflon itself.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 7 points 14 hours ago

In the same way Asbestos is a great material, just one small problem

[-] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago

Asbestos makes for a great cigarette filter material, though.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 11 hours ago

It is certainly... impactful for your lungs.

[-] Mambert@beehaw.org 1 points 14 hours ago

We are too weak for the miracle of asbestos.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 12 hours ago

Asbestos itself is toxic. Teflon is inert.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
242 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

16250 readers
2842 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS