89
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by xiaohongshu@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Source

Usually, they only censor the explicit content. But this is the first time that AI tools were used to directly alter the content of the original film.

By the way, the film has been withdrawn from a wide release in China after receiving too many complaints.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

And why do you think they are overzealous with their changes?

Because the west is absolutely swamped with media claiming all kinds of completely false things about China, the people believe them, and then they act on them if they're in a position of decision making power.

Do you seriously think the censors are stupid and don’t know what’s being done to the film?

The censors don't give a shit what the producers are doing to the film. Their job is to judge the film they're given, not to send it back and say "actually you've gone too far with your changes here and here and here".

Maybe you have a case that they should be given the power to send it back and say "no don't change this". But that's not what their job is currently.

[-] RagingGingivitis@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

yeah this is a very blatant example of corpos being sinophobic & sloppy

[-] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

The user you’re responding makes a lot of assumptions and doesn’t understand how import films are distributed in China. There is a distinct difference between buyout/acquisition films and revenue-sharing films. The film in question belongs to the former.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
89 points (92.4% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14118 readers
696 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS