143

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of the three leaders of the constitutive states of the Alliance of Sahel States (Mali's Assimi Goïta, Niger's Abdourahamane Tchiani, and Burkina Faso's Ibrahim Traoré) marching together in Bamako, Mali.


At the start of last week concluded the Summit of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES in French), in which, among other significant news, was the announcement of the creation of a unified military force for the alliance - called, rather straightforwardly, the Unified Force - which currently consists of about 5000 soldiers. Strictly speaking, joint military operations between the three countries had already been taking place for over a year before this point, but I imagine this organization streamlines the internal processes and makes it truly official.

Mali's Goïta delivered a speech during the summit in which he stated there were three main threats to the alliance: military, economic, and media. While this new military force is a major effort to combat military threats, the three countries have also mutually launched television, radio, and print media organizations to combat disinformation and psychological warfare. The economic aspect is the most tricky aspect of all, as (albeit decaying) American hegemony is not friendly to states which seek an independent economic path, most especially if that path does not directly benefit Western international corporations. Nonetheless, the three countries are doing what they can; they mutually launched an AES passport earlier in 2025, and this month, Mali has taken a bold move, recovering $1.2 billion after renegotiating mining deals with mining corporations after a comprehensive audit. Gold mining in Mali is a major sector of the economy, comprising about 20% of annual government revenue.

The three countries have also withdrawn from ECOWAS. The remaining countries consist of a small collection of West African countries, most significantly among them Nigeria and Côte d’Ivoire. ECOWAS is increasingly seen by the AES leadership - quite rightfully - as an organization which seeks to contain the radical shift in West Africa and return the region to the neocolonial French-governed status quo. As I talked about in a semi-recent news megathread, Nigeria is experiencing its own suite of internal problems, so perhaps in the coming years, ECOWAS will crumble from within and the AES can push back the terrorist organizations threatening them.


Last week's thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

China is, too. They're betting that the US will collapse even more before the final confrontation. They're not stupid, they're just callous.

[-] darkcalling@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They're betting the US will collapse in the next 5 years? Because in 5 years the US can do a hell of a lot to reshape the map. The map is largely already in their favor with a few tiny hold-outs, one of which just got taken out and the other is slated for being taken out (Iran). Others like African countries they can just bully by pointing to this, using moderate rebels, bribes, blackmail, etc. They'll take China's belt and road infrastructure and put it under US ownership, put the people in debt, take the wealth and minerals and perpetuate themselves and obviate China's moves for the next 30 years during which time they can turn up the pressure to crack China by blunting economic growth, sewing separatism, and creating dissatisfaction with the government for living conditions not improving.

I hate to say it but I really think China is playing the wrong game. They think just being good, charitable and a good trading partner will win over the people of the world and bring about change. And absent a violent, experienced hegemon like the US prone to coups, use of hybrid warfare, sanctions, intrigue, manipulation, sewing terrorists and rebellions and a master of propaganda and controller of the world culture and media that might be true but it is not absent that, it has that problem. Last century in the last cold war a lot of newly freed colonies soft-sided with the USSR but didn't hard-side with them and we saw how that ended for the USSR despite their efforts to export development help.

If China had had another 10 years to win over the people of the world, clearly show them they were better and not the US maybe the US would find it impossible to undo with coups and dictators and forced trade deals and debt bondage but they don't. US is an old hand at propaganda and will spin the victimization of people under the new US regime as being China's fault or that of their neighbors or other religious groups or whatever.

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's what I was saying, China is playing the long game, letting the US collapse under its own contradictions and take out half of the world with it.

They think just being good, charitable and a good trading partner will win over the people of the world and bring about change

Or they think that doing that will secure the material base for socialism in China. I'm highly suspicious of any solidarity China shows outside of its borders.

[-] Doubledee@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

It's not easy to project power at a distance like the US does. China does not have the global infrastructure to do so. They could not win this for Venezuela, they would need to adopt a similar strategy to what the US has done with its global footprint.

[-] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

China can leverage export restrictions such as rare earth materials to at least force the empire to reconsider.

Please don’t tell me that one of the world’s largest economy, the most industrialized nation in the world with 31% of global manufacturing share, is so weak that it has no cards to play in the face of global conflict. It’s not like the US has the capacity to invade China if they don’t like China’s response either.

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

I have nothing of substance to contribute, but I just wanna thank you for pushing back against the "China is a smol bean they cant do nothing" nonsense here

[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

China can leverage export restrictions such as rare earth materials to at least force the empire to reconsider.

Hasn't that already happened though? Choked By China, U.S. Relies On Abandoned French Factory Stockpile To Keep F-35s, Tomahawks Flying

Also it's literally been like a day, we don't know what China is or isn't going to do.

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I never was under the illusion that China would put boots on the ground to defend another country's sovereignty. The only time that happened was over 70 years ago.

Im saying that China will allow and even give a thumbs up to the death of millions in the global south if that means they can further consolidate their position in the coming multipolar world.

[-] Boise_Idaho@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

The PLAN has to more or less sail across the world to help Venezuela because unlike the US, it can't use the Panama Canal but has to sail through the Indian Ocean to arrive at Venezuela via the southern Atlantic. From a purely logistics POV, Venezuela is very much part of the US's backyard. The only countries more US-backyardy than Venezuela are Canada, Mexico, central America, and the Caribbean.

[-] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Waiting for a bloodthirsty enemy to collapse while you watch them gobble up all of your allies seems like a dangerous strategy to me.

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Can you still trade? Do you still have access to the largest consumer markets in the world (China, India and US)? That seems to be good enough for China.

Besides, the more the US thrashes in its death throes taking out small fish, the easier they will be to take down when the inevitable armed conflict comes.

That's the long term strategy I believe they're pursuing.

[-] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That does seem to be their long term strategy. Will it work? Only time will tell. Personally, I'm not convinced it's a good strategy to let an era of the blackest reaction spread unhindered until it reaches your own doorsteps and you're forced to face the entire planet.

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Whether it is effective or not, as you said, time will tell. China has shown it's capable of dealing with global reaction, keeping them out of their business as long as they're happy, while wielding the PLA as the stick to that carrot.

It is callous and inhumane for literally everyone else on the planet, that's for sure.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
143 points (100.0% liked)

news

24560 readers
787 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS