647

Omg (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 weeks ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 131 points 2 weeks ago

50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.

[-] lividweasel@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 86 points 2 weeks ago

Or as I've recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I will never get sick of this ridiculous copypasta

[-] mech@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Found the Slackware user.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's exactly how I've always pronounced it, too.

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago

Something I learned from QI

Stonehenge is not a true henge, as its ditch runs outside its bank, although there is a small extant external bank as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The article ~~you keep linking~~ disagrees.

Although having given its name to the word henge, Stonehenge is atypical in that the ditch is outside the main earthwork bank.

An atypical example of something is still a "true" example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

Edit: Oops, mistook 2 basic pedants regurgitating trivia as the same person.

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

I keep linking..?

An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

I think the article is a bit confused in both defining the "henge" and saying if it is a henge or not. It sets a definition that Stonehenge doesn't follow, calls it "atypical", says it's not "true" henge (whatever that means) and so on. And all of those seem to be not directly sourced. One of the sources makes the confusion even worse:

Ironically, even though Stonehenge has an earthwork circle around it (the earliest phase of the monument), it isn’t officially a ‘proper’ henge, as the main ditch is external to the main bank. It has to make do with being a ‘proto-henge’.

I guess in this use it a "proper" ("true"?) henge is a henge and "proto-henge" is not a henge but a thing that precedes them. That'd explain some of the confusion. Could also be that "proto-henge" is counted as a form of a henge, but I'm not sure. Other examples seem to consider it preceding actual henges.

It would help if there was one definition for henge but there seems to be some that define it like in the article, with the ditch inside and others that just include a ditch.