647
Omg (mander.xyz)
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 131 points 2 weeks ago

50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.

[-] lividweasel@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 86 points 2 weeks ago

Or as I've recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I will never get sick of this ridiculous copypasta

[-] mech@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Found the Slackware user.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's exactly how I've always pronounced it, too.

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago

Something I learned from QI

Stonehenge is not a true henge, as its ditch runs outside its bank, although there is a small extant external bank as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The article ~~you keep linking~~ disagrees.

Although having given its name to the word henge, Stonehenge is atypical in that the ditch is outside the main earthwork bank.

An atypical example of something is still a "true" example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

Edit: Oops, mistook 2 basic pedants regurgitating trivia as the same person.

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

I keep linking..?

An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

I think the article is a bit confused in both defining the "henge" and saying if it is a henge or not. It sets a definition that Stonehenge doesn't follow, calls it "atypical", says it's not "true" henge (whatever that means) and so on. And all of those seem to be not directly sourced. One of the sources makes the confusion even worse:

Ironically, even though Stonehenge has an earthwork circle around it (the earliest phase of the monument), it isn’t officially a ‘proper’ henge, as the main ditch is external to the main bank. It has to make do with being a ‘proto-henge’.

I guess in this use it a "proper" ("true"?) henge is a henge and "proto-henge" is not a henge but a thing that precedes them. That'd explain some of the confusion. Could also be that "proto-henge" is counted as a form of a henge, but I'm not sure. Other examples seem to consider it preceding actual henges.

It would help if there was one definition for henge but there seems to be some that define it like in the article, with the ditch inside and others that just include a ditch.

especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

Terms can change over time, it could be the definiton of "henge" has changed.

[-] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago

They reached this conclusion after they found a bunch of papers and scissors laying about

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 43 points 2 weeks ago

Wtf is wrong with people

[-] brian@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago

but they weren't destroying the rock, right? they were just splitting it up into smaller rocks. I bet they'd have a heck of a time actually destroying that rock.

pretty undestructible if you ask me? /s

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, the "stick vs.1000 us marines" conundrum

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

look i know a sure bet when i see one, and someone said that about the lewis light machine gun and 20,000 emus. I'm betting on the stick.

[-] blackbrook@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

It can only be destroyed by throwing it into the heart of Mount Doom. Or other volcano.

[-] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 39 points 2 weeks ago

Stonehenge did nothing wrong. Henge is the imposter here. Henge came by and just decided to define itself differently to discredit Stonehenge. Henge will never succeed in its sick plot.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

if we're defining it by the ditch, then what is it?

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Oh my God, now we're gatekeeping henges...

[-] frog@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

Based on the title for The Hill, is it even stone?

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh damn you had already mentioned this!

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 27 points 2 weeks ago

The druids designed Stonehenge in inches, but there was a mix-up and the contractor delivered the stones measured in feet.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean if it was built out of anything else the destructible material has been looted or destroyed by now. You can say this about pretty much every old thing.

Energy of this thread: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mbyzgeee2mg

[-] Digit@lemmy.wtf 11 points 2 weeks ago

nearly indestructible

Yeah. Nearly. That's why some got replaced with concrete to keep up appearances.

[-] markz@suppo.fi 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Enzy@feddit.nu 9 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yes Rockhenge

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

alien druid-engineers, foreseeing british hooliganism: yeah, can't use sandstone here, folks. 👷‍♀️

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Basalt is pretty tough I hear

[-] Mpatch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

As some one with experience in the rock crushing industry. Yes, yes it is

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Barium salt? It's got electrolytes.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Why is a political website posting about Stonehenge...

[-] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

So much less destructible than Strawhenge or Woodhenge.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

....uh, your link is just to a stupid image.

[-] Ravi@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

No it's cake!

[-] Danarchy@lemmy.nz -1 points 2 weeks ago

Is this Loss? This is Loss isn’t it

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
647 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

18197 readers
1490 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS