77
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago

It's probably full of a lot of trash and impurities, melting it lets it be filtered through waste water systems.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 4 days ago

It's probably full of a lot of trash and impurities

I'm sorry are we talking about the Hudson or the snow?

But sure, I to don't want to keep using rivers as a toilet. I'm just not sure the energy costs are better since that is also a pollutant and this injects another machine as a thing that needs parts, grease, salt and a lot of generated heat, as well as a bottleneck on processing speed.

This feels more like a good salesman was involved than a practical decision.

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
77 points (98.7% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14257 readers
886 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS