171

Like, we all know they're listening , but can we provide proof?

My friend was complaining about all the new super surveillance that will be government required in cars after 2027, and I said to him dude you have a stock android, you use every AI slop feature, you use a smart TV on your unsecured network, and uses x every day. They have everything they could possibly need on him. Oh and he posts questionable things to fb daily under his real name.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] glitching@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 days ago

don't need any such "proof". the whole industry has lost any and all benefit-of-doubt privileges, for ever. they don't get an opportunity to gain a foothold in mi casa and possibly be in a position to do harm.

I don't get the idea that after all the shit they pulled someone's like "well maybe this new thing's nice".

those are immoral people with zero compunctions about doing anything that hurts you, your community, and humanity as a whole. we are in an adversarial position and you'd do well to remind yourself of that constantly.

[-] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I don’t get the idea that after all the shit they pulled someone’s like “well maybe this new thing’s nice”.

I look at my friends who do this even though I advize them not to. For them, data is invisible and out of sight, out of mind. Their TV is a consumer device like IDK a toaster or washing machien. They put it online with no real thought to data or privacy. From their perspective this is normal. Their neighbors all do it with their TVs. Their friends all do it! I am the only one who makes a warning to them. Everyone else they know does it. Who wouldn't want a "smart" TV???

They don't understand tech very well and they feel like what they see most people doing must be good. They are not thinking about the eroding effect on their whole society from normalizing dragnet surveillance and total privacy loss. It's too abstract, and the allure of the shiny is too much.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Same here. im the crazy one because I dont want zucc listening to me in my home. I can't stand normies dude. Brainwashed.

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Puedo yo poner in foothold en tu casa?

[-] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

the English would be un pie, and you can drop the yo :)

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Oh, no the preocupes, el uso de foothold aquí fue una elección artística

[-] frozenspinach@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

don’t need any such “proof”

I'm gonna stop you there. I'm okay with no benefit of the doubt in terms of them being bad actors, but your worldview still has to be built at the bones and joints out of things known to be true otherwise there's no stopping you from believing every conspiracy with no guard rails.

I don't think there's yet a specific smoking gun on this front, but I think once there is, then it is okay to presume it likely happening in other instances. But no smoking gun just yet.

[-] glitching@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

you're ignoring the important part - who that's coming from.

analyzing a new shit-sandwich from the shit-sandwich-shop to determine "does this one have shit in it" is a valid academic endeavor, but hardly something you'd spend one second of your life pondering.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
171 points (95.2% liked)

Privacy

47303 readers
749 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS