169

Like, we all know they're listening , but can we provide proof?

My friend was complaining about all the new super surveillance that will be government required in cars after 2027, and I said to him dude you have a stock android, you use every AI slop feature, you use a smart TV on your unsecured network, and uses x every day. They have everything they could possibly need on him. Oh and he posts questionable things to fb daily under his real name.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 13 hours ago

I saw proof one day. I was visiting a welding shop on business, never been there before, didn't know them. At some point, I'm sitting in the office with about five guys, distracting them from their work, yakking, and I mention a big piece of gear I have to haul around using a cart. One suggests a different kind of cart, and describes it. As we're talking, one of the other guys gasps, and holds his phone up to show the boss.

While we were talking, this guy opened his phone, and the first ad that popped up was for that odd, obscure equipment cart that we had just been talking about.

It turned out that these guys had been discussing this subject earlier, and now it was confirmed for all of us.

[-] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

The fun part is that they dnt even need to listen for this. They track everything you search, link it to your phones ip, number, and location. But it doesnt stop there. They know people will talk to the people they are around.

So if person A searches something 2 days ago and then goes to hang out with person B who has similar interests, they will serve ads about those products to person B because they figure it will be relevant at some point. Basically, the prediction software is so good that it comes off as listening to every word you said.

They are def also listening, but this is more often what is happening. Use a vpn and privacy focused browser and you will notice the relevance of ads drop significantly

[-] knee@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Last paragraph: This!

[-] Neverbeaten@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

What ads? My browser blocks ads. My vpn blocks ads. I pay for email so don’t see ads there. I pay for search so I don’t see ads there, either. I self host media. My TV doesn’t connect to the internet.

I seriously never see ads.

[-] knee@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

👍 Well done there. Using Brave, DDG, Ecosia and Firefox. Got Mulvad, got Tuta. Pay for search? Who with? Moving towards self hosting. Just ditched internet on my TV.

[-] Neverbeaten@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I pay for Kagi search.

[-] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Yes. This suggestion is for folks that are tired of constant ads. Not folks that are already doing what i just suggested lol

[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

The one that did it for me - I was in the car with my wife and a friend. We were driving down the highway and talking about the clouds we saw. And I said "I wander what kind of clouds those are. Like cumulus? Alto?"

The I take out my phone and type "types of" and the first auto-fill option that came up was "types of cloud" and I was like "there's no fucking way that just happens to be the highest suggested search prompt"

[-] jpeps@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

More likely you weren't the only one making searches like that in that area.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago

It won't be long before we'll be getting into sexy time with the spouse, and the phone on the nightstand dings with a notification. You pause to check it, and it's an ad for a new sex lube!

[-] CPMSP@midwest.social 2 points 11 hours ago
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 6 points 14 hours ago

Regarding TVs, WikiLeaks' Vault 7 publication in 2017 included "Weeping Angel", CIA malware for Samsung TVs which streams audio from them while they're in "fake off" mode.

https://mashable.com/article/cia-samsung-tv-hack-weeping-angel

[-] ragas@lemmy.ml 8 points 16 hours ago
[-] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 hours ago

Fuck that tabloid, the Daily Mail... but there was the guy who was attempting to mod his robovac so he could control it with a PlayStation controller. The AI he was using to help ended up giving him keys that let him remotely access thousands of robovacs, including their cameras and mics.

[-] kazerniel@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

and this is why I made sure to get a model without a camera D:

[-] ragas@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

That is what I did too for the first one. My current vacuum uses valetudo as alternative firmware.

[-] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago
[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 minutes ago

So this proves it. Then his second video was made because the MIB came to his door. Got it.

They're absolutely listening.

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago

It's not logically sound, but at this point the burden of proof needs to be on Big Tech if they want to claim they're not spying. Otherwise we'd have to prove it for each individual model, and that isn't feasible, and only supports the opposition.

[-] Abrinoxus@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

get a proj, only hdmi, only via laptop thats what i did

[-] Lars_Tanner@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Mark Zuckerberg puts a sticker over his laptop camera and microphone.

[-] kutt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

This isn’t a proof of mass surveillance. He’s one of the most famous people on earth and he’s probably the target of many hackers.

[-] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

He also gave his famous opinion about Facebook users. Deep down, he agrees with privacy advocates. The diff is that he's a shitty enough person to take advantage of the less techy people out there even if his society will be damaged badly in the process. Most of us are not that shitty.

they trust me

dumb fucks

I think we can move beyond Facebook here. Trusting big tech with your data never works out well.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

That's called being a Sociopathic Oligarch

[-] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

the biggest hypocrites are tech CEO's limiting their children's screen time and forbidding social media

[-] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

Are drug lords who are not actively overdosing on their adulterated products also hypocrites?

[-] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

I mean kind of yeah

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

You can get sound from any speaker by hacking the electrical signals generated in reverse.

[-] mech@feddit.org 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The manufacturers tell you.

And they even make you click the "I have read and understood this" button under the document that explicitly states that they're spying on you and selling all your data.

[-] mulcahey@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

AFAIK this is the only evidence: a claim by a marketing company that they're actually doing it. However, they have some reason to lie about this, bc it makes them sound all-knowing and powerful to their clients.

https://www.404media.co/cmg-cox-media-actually-listening-to-phones-smartspeakers-for-ads-marketing/

[-] nixukty@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago

The very notion of proof implies that you can reproduce it. So I would suggest you forget what anybody here or elsewhere said. Instead, you :

  • get a cheap phone (so typically Android)
  • reset/format/flash it to a blank state
  • make a new testing account on it
  • use for random browsing, using app, etc and you log your history, namely what did you actually do AND what ads you actually see
  • test for something outside of your new habits with a search query, then log and compare again, seeing the threshold to change
  • repeat the last step for something said using e.g. a voice assistant, log&compare
  • repeat WITHOUT explicit search, log&compare

Yes this takes a of time but that will help you make YOUR own opinion on the matter if you genuinely care.

[-] meathorse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Think of something you've never mentioned or discussed before, then out of nowhere, start having a conversation with a friend about it, how much you like it and are thinking about getting it, taking lessons etc then see what happens over the next week on either your or your friend's ads (turn off ad blocker if you use one).

I recommend something completely unusual for most people like an instrument (didgeridoo or cowbell)

[-] glitching@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago

don't need any such "proof". the whole industry has lost any and all benefit-of-doubt privileges, for ever. they don't get an opportunity to gain a foothold in mi casa and possibly be in a position to do harm.

I don't get the idea that after all the shit they pulled someone's like "well maybe this new thing's nice".

those are immoral people with zero compunctions about doing anything that hurts you, your community, and humanity as a whole. we are in an adversarial position and you'd do well to remind yourself of that constantly.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Every device made to receive voice commands (Smart TVs, Amazon Echo) WILL listen to everything you say.

And if they provide a button or setting to turn that off you are relying on trusting them to comply with it (I don't think they do and even if they are found doing it they will probably pay a minuscule fine for it)

[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's court cases lost by Google and Apple

Also, whenever monolithic megacorporations not recording you directly, virtually everyone is still buying any data about you they can get from actual malware distributing criminals.

Microphone hijacking is real and commonplace. (Edit: Fixed link thanks to some feedback.)

The malware vendors sell what they learn about us on black markets. And in net effect, everyone is buying from them.

They "Privacy Wash" the things they learn from the illegal recordings, by passing them from one disreputable broker to another. Each broker can keep poor quality records of exactly where they got their data. Pretty soon it's just "part of your digital fingerprint" and "can't be helped".

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
169 points (95.2% liked)

Privacy

47303 readers
995 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS