189
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a destroyed American AWACS plane in Saudi Arabia, of which there is a very limited supply and each of which is enormously expensive both monetarily and in terms of components. Iran hit this with a precision drone strike that likely cost ~$20,000.


I don't have much to add from the last megathread description. This isn't to say that nothing has happened or has changed since then - decades are still happening in weeks - but the general flow of the war is remaining the same. Trump sometimes threatens to open the Strait with troops and flatten Iran to rubble, and other times threatens that he's gonna back off and let other countries handle it if they really want little trifles like "fuel" and "energy" so much. Iran continues to strike across the Middle East. The West continues to bomb civilian infrastructure due to their relative inability to affect the missile cities. In all: things are generally getting worse for America and the Zionists.

April is the month where the last ships that left Hormuz before it was closed will arrive around the world, so the last month of economic turmoil has been a mere prelude to what's going to occur in the near-future. The silver lining is that Iran appears to be formalizing the new state of affairs in Hormuz, creating a rial-based toll to allow passage between a pair of Iranian-controlled islands where they can be monitored, meaning that, as long as the US doesn't do something exceptionally stupid, the global energy crisis may "only" last a couple years instead of simply being the new reality from now on. Some countries have already agreed to this arrangement, and others will inevitably follow despite their consternation as their economies increasingly suffer.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 99 points 1 day ago

NYTimes with a new article, insane that the mainstream American press is printing stuff like this but such is the world the Epstein Class has decided to birth. «The War Is Turning Iran Into a Major World Power» is the title, and nothing in there is anything we haven't talked about here extensively, but to see the mainstream press draw these conclusions still reads like a fever dream to me.

Imagine Iran with control of about 20 percent of the world’s oil, Russia with about 11 percent and China able to soak up much of that supply. They would form a cartel to deny the West 30 percent of the world’s oil. You don’t need sophisticated analysis to recognize the catastrophic consequences: precipitously declining power for the United States and Europe, and a global shift toward China, Russia and Iran. The United States faces a difficult choice: either commit to a long-term effort to reassert control over the Strait of Hormuz, or accept a new global energy arrangement in which U.S. control is no longer assured.

If it chooses acceptance, the outcome is clear: The international system will reorganize with Iran as a fourth center of global power. Yet if the United States chooses to reassert military control, it is in for a long battle, one it could well lose. The Iran war is not a military conflict from which the United States can simply back out, with things reverting to how they were before. Iran would surely demand a heavy price in a new accommodation with the United States — but this price will surely be less costly than that of the alternative future. This is a transformational war, and if these changes continue for even a few years, the global order will change irrevocably.

Per https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/06/opinion/iran-war-strait-hormuz.html

[-] test_@hexbear.net 4 points 15 hours ago

That two-paragraph excerpt almost reads like they are goading the Trump administration into continuing the war

[-] vietnoomer@lemdro.id 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I mean, this is what you get from logic like "any state that's able to militarily or economically resist the US coercion is a power on par with it" It's an insidious framing that ignores how overextended and global U.S. reach rly is and how intricate the networks it uses to extend that power are. A lot of pseudo-communist orgs in the west have fallen for this.

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Damn almost as if you would have been better off simply trading with them instead of doing this shit but the britbongian brainpan renders its bearer incapable of behaving like civilized modern humans

[-] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 69 points 1 day ago

They would form a cartel to deny the West 30 percent of the world’s oil.

Now why would 12% of the world population need (much less deserve) 30% of the oil?

three-heads-thinking

[-] Muinteoir_Saoirse@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

Seems more like they're saying that 12% of the world's population should have at least 70% of the world's oil, because it is an affront for them to not have even just 30% of it.

[-] woodenghost@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago

On top of all the oil they already have control over

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 68 points 1 day ago

Incredible the comments on this one folks. The two top rated comments are:

Iran is turning into a major power? How? By being bombed day and night? By watching its leaders decapitated? Well, I don't really care. Let's wait for one more day, when Iran will either relinquish its control of the Strait or be bombed back into the stone age. No one could twist reality to present a stone age country as a major power.

"Stone Age country" successfully keeps the Strait of Hormuz closed is going to hit hard. The European Bell Beakers would be so jealous of the stone age tech Iran has invented. I'm sure the Stone Age peoples of Çatalhöyük would love launching a Shahed-136, really cutting edge Stone Age tech.

A few pipe lines to Haifa will make Hormuz and Iran obsolete.

"A few pipelines well within the range of Iranian standoff weaponry will make Hormuz and Iran obsolete!"

[-] jack@hexbear.net 64 points 1 day ago

the stone age country with more engineering graduates than the US

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 37 points 1 day ago

Of course Stone Age types think "literacy" and "engineering" are values; it's because they don't have "books" and "machines." True post-Stone Age enlightened beings like Americans know the world actually runs on vibes, willpower, and "war fighting" spirit.

[-] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 58 points 1 day ago

These people are absolutely unprepared for reality, and will become even more delusional and violent as the decline becomes more undeniable

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

The satanic racism of NYCrimes commenters would make an 18th-century European Count blush

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

Pipelines, fast and easy to construct? I'm sure

[-] jack@hexbear.net 61 points 1 day ago

If it chooses acceptance, the outcome is clear: The international system will reorganize with Iran as a fourth center of global power

This is more optimistic than I've seen anyone argue for here. Iran not just as a major regional power with fully secured sovereignty that has weakened the empire, but in itself a global power on the same plane as Russia, China and the US? I don't think I'm willing to go that far if only because its population is too small. I don't think a nation of 90 million people could project global power with the big players.

There is, I guess, a path to this sort of outcome, but I don't think it's as likely or as neat as this piece says. If Iran facilitates the birth of a unified Arab republic/confederation of the Levant, Mesopotamia, and the Arabian Peninsula (and even more optimistically, the whole Arab League), that would be a new global power able to assert itself as a 4th pole in close coordination with Iran. But then we're only a few steps from the total defeat of imperialism, so let's not get ahead of ourselves.

[-] Rey_McSriff@hexbear.net 47 points 1 day ago

I think it also supposes that the entire reason Iran would be able to become a world power is because the world will continue to run on oil. Their power comes from denying or allowing the passage of oil from West Asia to the rest of the world, but if the world transitions away from oil, then their power goes away. Obviously that won't happen within the next few years but it's not like you can build a 500 year empire off of blocking 20% of the world's oil supply.

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 3 points 17 hours ago

Even if the world becomes less dependent on oil it’s not like that’s the only thing that passes through the strait. It’s a massive trade route.

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

Iran is a lot like China. Always a major player at some level during every period of history.

[-] jack@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

They call themselves "civilization states" for that reason. Who else can claim relevance and meaningful continuity for thousands upon thousands of years? India basically. Russia and Egypt make the claim.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_state

[-] Boise_Idaho@hexbear.net 11 points 23 hours ago

Conservatism in China flanked by both the ROC and PRC flags because the Wikipedia nerds can't decide which of them is China

i-cant

[-] 3rdWorldCommieCat@hexbear.net 55 points 1 day ago

May the global order change irrevocably in favor of the global south!

[-] jack@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago

it's going to, the only question is how much and how quickly

[-] 3rdWorldCommieCat@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago

One would hope as soon a possible but realistically it's gonna take decades to fully happen. We need to keep fighting and supporting eachother, especially those the empire focus the most each time. But it will happen.

[-] s0ykaf@hexbear.net 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

nothing in there is anything we haven't talked about here extensively

leftists being correct too early etc

[-] Rojo27@hexbear.net 42 points 1 day ago

They would form a cartel to deny the West 30 percent of the world’s oil

Describing a new dynamic in the control of oil as a "cartel" sure is an interesting choice.

Breaking our cartel monopoly is actually you making a cartel.

[-] 3rdWorldCommieCat@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

"Cartel" what lmao are they gonna accuse Khamenei of being a drug cartel leader and pull a maduro? I hate western journos. Everything bad and scary for them is a cartel now.

[-] woodenghost@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, it's some framing their doing, but it's about a cartel in the classic economic sense: companies controlling supply and setting prices high to avoid competition. Like the OPEC cartel is already doing for oil, except without US influence through the Gulf countries.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

Western stenography enemy epithet buzzword salad

[-] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Reads Natopedia definition of cartel

clueless I wonder what wholesome chungus OPEC stands for

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
189 points (99.5% liked)

news

24706 readers
869 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS