161

At least a dozen US military sites across the Gulf region have been so badly damaged by Iran's retaliation to US and Israeli attacks that their presence now creates significantly more vulnerabilities than it does benefits, a slate of Middle East experts argued on Thursday.

The original revelation about the state of the bases was first reported in The New York Times last month, in which they were described as "all but uninhabitable".

The Trump administration has yet to acknowledge the extent of the damage sustained.

"This is the physical architecture of American primacy, and Iran has essentially rendered it useless in the span of a month," Marc Lynch, director of the Project on Middle East Political Science at George Washington University, said at the Arab Center Washington DC's annual conference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Those bases were never thought to need defense other than local riots. The thought was that nobody would dare attack them. They were seen as defense by their nature of existing. The defense being the threat of American offense coming a week later to wreak havoc. But if you put a country on their heels, what difference does it make? Might as well go out swinging, and that's what they did, and it worked.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 21 hours ago

Absolutely, the whole premise was that nobody would have the audacity to fight the US directly. There is a famous poker saying that you don't bluff someone who can't fold. Iran couldn't fold because their survival as a state depended on it. So Trump's made the worst possible blunder, trying to bluff against an opponent with no exit and maximum stakes.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
161 points (98.8% liked)

World News

40204 readers
515 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS