111

A few days back I watched a SomeOrdinaryGamers video, in which he states to drive a Tesla car, despite expressing the obvious privacy concerns surrounding the built-in camera system; but doesn't seem to consider the privacy-impact to those around the vehicle, he chooses to drive through public streets. And another example being Rob Braxman, while ironically, both known to frequently criticize other public-facing, internet connected surveillance systems (like Ring for example).

If it was "just" a cabin camera, staring you straight in the face every time you drive your car (and you're somehow okay with that), it would still be a terrible look in context with your channel content, but at least it is contained to you personally. But knowingly driving these surveillance nightmares on wheels through public streets, subjecting others to that surveillance, while you represent pro-privacy channels online, is just inexcusably hypocritical to me. But perhaps it might just be me, so what are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The dumbfuck YouTuber who pretended to be an engineer loves Teslas? Amazing. On the nose.

Also, don't get your privacy advice from YouTube. A horrible idea.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

isn't techlore the one who said iphones are better for privacy than even linux computers? 🤣

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

did he? when, where? context?

techlore is an up to date privacy source for me. Their commentary on recent events is sometimes helpful

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it was a few years ago now, i won't be able to find it, but it was on youtube.

[-] IratePirate@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

i won't be able to find it

That's a very lazy follow-up to quite a broad claim. Please do provide evidence.

[-] IratePirate@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've been following their content pretty closely, and I do not recall anything of that sort. They did recommend iPhone over stock Android, which is accurate.

So until you can produce a source to that claim, I call horseshit.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I mean yes I could see that for average person. Nothing makes a Linux computer private. You can still use chrome. Allow ads to track you, tons of people don't use ad blockers. I mean saying a default iOS device is can be more private then default Linux PC I could see it.

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

That seems reasonable. Linux computers are only secure with a skilled user, the average user likely has their privacy better protected by iOS which while slightly weaker on privacy is much more locked down on security.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i don't think that matters that much when you are forced to accept their privacy policy to use the app anyway, which is much less of a thing on linux computers than on phone oses. i don't really see how you'd need to be skilled to take advantage of it.

[-] IratePirate@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Even Braxman isn't too bad if you can separate the information from his product advertisements and his... personality.

[-] undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago
[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

i haven't heard of the hated one before. I tried to watch this ☞ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AynIIFM2WU but i couldn't get past the "it was i... i said... i was first

3 minutes already and no information.

[-] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Wasn't aware of him pretending to be an engineer haha. I would argue it varies greatly on YouTube, just like it varies coming from other sources: all with a healthy dose of skepticism. Rob's content may be valuable to me, as it tends to raise awareness on subjects which other channels won't address, or only address when it finally receives mainstream coverage. These channels typically don't provide anything new to me, but given the number of subscribers to these channels, there's quite some people that do seem to actively engage with the content; and may therefore be influenced by it, which is primarily why I gauge the content periodically.

this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
111 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

48920 readers
424 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS