Image is from this Bloomberg article, depicting world oil inventories plunging towards the operational floor at which pipelines and refineries cease operating, which is expected to occur in September at current rates.
A pretty short preamble below, in spoiler tags.
summary
The conflict continues to be kept at a relatively low level despite Iran's fiery encounters with US destroyers. I think it's only becoming increasingly obvious that the US is trying to cobble together some major clandestine operation mixing special forces, the air force, and naval destroyers to either seize Iranian uranium, take control of Iranian seaports, or both. Given a) how the Istafan op went, b) further Iranian preparations around sensitive sites, and c) a seeming strengthening of Iranian air defense around the Persian Gulf (multiple drones and manned aircraft have squawked emergency codes and potentially been shot down over the last few weeks), I find it difficult to imagine this operation fulfilling its objective, and even if did somehow work, why the removal of uranium would necessitate Iran ending the blockade and the war. On that note, I've seen reports that Iran is saying that if the US attacks their oil tankers again, they will resume firing on US military bases.
Additionally, Aragchi has stated that not only has Iran's missile/launcher stockpiles not gone down from pre-conflict, it has actually increased by 20%. This is unsurprising given the total war that Iran is now in; all resources within reason must now be funnelling towards drone and missile production.
Atrocities in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon are continuing. The toll that FPV drones are taking on the common Zionist soldiery are quickly becoming apparent, as we are receiving ever-increasing amounts of footage of vehicles and gatherings of soldiers being struck by Hezbollah's drones. The casualty situation is, as expected, being hidden, but any kind of serious occupation of even the border villages of southern Lebanon (let alone up to the Litani) seems unsustainable.
Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
They're advocating mass murder.
Importantly this as mentioned would require a ground invasion. The US is technically capable of this, they could bring in troops to siege and destroy the missile cities and the bigger subterranean complexes, they have the equipment and they have enough troops to accomplish this. They'd take horrific losses doing it. But they could do so if they wanted to commit. The problem is they wouldn't be able to extricate themselves from that, they'd have to fully occupy the country, police it against a persistent and popular insurgency, and continue to commit massive resources including troops to the task for the foreseeable future leaving China to develop in peace through 2035.
What's interesting is the author's fantasy that gun-boating can return. That Europe will somehow build up its own navies and these European navies will overcome the Iranian land missile and drone advantage and force the strait open. The dynamic has fundamentally changed. Any power like Iran that wields advanced missiles and drones in significant quantities and can make more under siege can reasonably repel and destroy naval forces near its own coastlines. There are luckily for the imperialists relatively few such powers a present. Iran, China, Russia, India (which is more in the western corner anyways being run by Hindu fascists as it is), and maybe the DPRK are about it for non-western aligned, non-vassal states that can do this.
I really don't see how this is even remotely plausible. The Iraq wars required months of build-up, and the US had the luxury of friendly countries willing to host its troops - the logistical capacity they used back then literally does not exist anymore, the bases in the region in which they would build up troops have been bombed to shit, and Iran has already shown what will happen to troop build-up efforts with all the hits they did on the Kurds. Even if they could somehow amass these troops and deploy them into Iran, "siege and destroy the missile cities" is a "don't siege Leningrad, take it immediately"-tier statement - there are dozens of missile cities, spread across all the provinces of Iran, a country nearly 3 times the size of France, with rugged mountainous terrain. How is the US going to deploy these troops all over Iran, and then support them over the course of the campaign? How is it going to get them out? A dozen more instances of something akin to that (alleged) rescue operation and the US is going to be down like a hundred aircraft. And what exactly would "destroying" the missile cities even entail? What equipment that troops flown in could bring with them could be used to thoroughly destroy entire tunnel networks like this? This is beyond horrific losses, it would be literally feeding men and irreplaceable airframes into an Iranian meat-grinder.
And they most definitely do not have the troops for a full occupation of Iran, they barely managed one of Iraq, having to lower recruitment standards, deploy a ton of National Guard units, stop-loss a whole bunch of guys, and that was with them having a bunch of coalition partners and allied Iraqi forces.
I see no reason to believe they are at all capable of that
Turkey could do it, Pakistan could do it, Brazil could probably do it