160
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ValueSubtracted@startrek.website to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It seems CBC aren’t familiar with how this played out in Australia.

[-] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago

I think they are, but understand that the dynamics of the situation are different within the North American context.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The proposed legislation in Canada was directly inspired by what happened in Australia.

What “dynamics“ are different with regards to paying for news on their platform in Canada compared to Australia?

[-] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 0 points 2 years ago

Canada is economically integrated with the United States in a way that Australia is not. Meta and Google understand that precedents weigh differently here.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago
[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It’s literally in the linked article

Another situation came to a head in Australia two years ago, with Facebook blocking news content after being ordered to shell out cash. The standoff ended quickly with the major social media platforms agreeing a deal with the Australian government to create the News Media Bargaining Code, which sees news providers paid for their online content.

Facebook made it seem like everyone would lose out to give themselves a better bargaining position and now they pay for news content in Australia.

They will simply do this everywhere and force terms they find acceptable, or block news in countries unwilling to negotiate.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

Okay, but what is your point exactly? You seem to be arguing with...something.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

CBC’s prediction isn’t worth much when we have precedent that says otherwise.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago

Is there any indication whatsoever that Facebook is willing to enter into negotiations with the government over this? If there is, I missed it.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

There are those who learn from history and those who are doomed to repeat it.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

Do you have anything to add beyond platitudes?

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Facebook is a corporation. Corporations operate for profit.

If negotiating would lead to continued profit they will negotiate.

I didn’t realise this was c/explainlikeimfive but here we are.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

Always good to interact with your peers.

[-] Rocket@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Corporations operate for profit.

Nonprofit and not-for-profit corporations have entered the chat...

[-] k_rol@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
160 points (96.5% liked)

Canada

9421 readers
749 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS