23
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, my effort post was more about how the anhedonic remark and how I didn't find proof in the past (but kept it in mind) and that I found proof he talked about his asexuality btw. (I either didn't look hard in the past or forgot I found the proof before already).

[-] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

Don't apologize, I was talking out of my ass.

Maybe the 2 Scotts represent the 2 poles of TREACLES sexuality - on the one hand, the effortless "I'm too sexy for my shirt, all the girls want me, but I will not give in to the pleasures of the flesh", on the other the seething resentment that hot girls are denied them. I dunno, this has led to me thinking way too much about the sex lives of 2 people I really cannot stand.[1]

[1] that said, I'm pretty sure Aaronson would at least try to be a good dad. But maybe I'm being too generous.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago

"polarity of TREACLES sexuality" is an infohazard, damn you :P

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

979 readers
99 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS