395
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

No shit. We had plenty of guns when I was a kid (52 now), even AR-15s and the like, and this wasn't a normal thing until after Columbine.

I'd hold off on my manifesto, :), but mental health has taken a nosedive in this country. It's far, far worse than kids can imagine. Fox News, Facebook, the internet, etc. has poisoned our collective brains and discourse.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

I'm 38, and yeah it's seriously fucked. I keep saying this and people still want to plug their ears and scream "it's the guns!".

I'm a prime example, I have ADHD and hardcore insomnia, and I got laid off a few months ago, my health insurance just ended. In order to see a psychiatrist it's gonna cost me $300 out of pocket for the visit, and then generic Ambien is like $120 for 60 pills. I got letters that say I could get health insurance via the COBRA Act of 1985, but it's SEVEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY DOLLARS A MONTH. Healthcare.gov keeps playing commercials that say "enroll now and you can get health insurance for as low as $10/month!". I went on there to look and it's only available for 2024 right now and they want to know your income for 2024. I put in 80k and they said I wasn't eligible, I put in 40k and it said it was gonna cost $350/month.

My dad is 73 and he constantly has to fight with insurance and the pharmacy to get his Ambien as well.

It's absolutely ridiculous.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Losing your insurance/job is one of those situations that they'll enroll you early

[-] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I get your trying to help but you're missing the point

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ah thanks for the info, but it will still probably be less to pay out of pocket. The shrink's follow up is $200 and the Ambien will be $120. IDK how much I can get the premium down to, and even then there's the deductibles.

[-] silverbax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

If you aren't working, put in zero as your salary.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's what I'm thinking, but the question is "how much will you be making in 2024?" not "How much are you currently making?"

[-] silverbax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can't know the future, what if the economy craters? If and when your salary changes, you update it then.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly, it's a dumb question, no one really knows how much they'll be making in the future, but it's not like 2024 is far away.

[-] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's brutal, and I'm very sorry to hear that. No one should have to struggle to find help, especially for stuff like that.

I think this whole system is stupid, even from a business sense. If you want quality labour, "happy employees" are the way to go. If you prevent people from getting much wanted/needed help, you'll have a lot less of those "happy employees". You'll also have fewer taxes being paid, less money being spent, fewer people attending events and buying non-essential things, etc. The current set-up makes no sense to me. Instead of imporving anything, let's just keep continuing to make things worse and then complain that society is getting worse. That will totally fix things. It hasn't worked for the past couple of decades, but it will totally magically change tomorrow. Assholes.

I hope things get much better for you and your father soon. Y'all deserve MUCH better than this.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Thanks 😊 The problem is that they have no souls and conscience, and only care about money, so I don't think anything will change this unless we go with public/socialized healthcare but that will never happen because "socialism" is "the worst thing that could happen" according to some people.... my dad is against it because he "doesn't want to help pay for some low-life's healthcare which he has worked his ass off to pay into" 🤦‍♂️

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

If you aren’t working, why are you putting in any salary?

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

But... what about the shareholders? What about about their return on investment?

/s

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

almost 10% of your income!? fuck the "hyper socialist" Germany has 6% from my taxes

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They took about 30% of my yearly income for local (I lived and worked in NYC for 7 years), state, and federal taxes for the past few years! I may get about 5% or less of that back in my tax return.

Best country in the world! 🤑

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago

If it puts your mind at ease at all, crime (violent and otherwise) had been on a decline from 1993 until 2016 and while it has risen since 2016, it still hasn't hit pre-'93 levels last I saw. Furthermore despite what you'd expect, those AR-15s are responsible for less than 500 (all rifles) of our 60,000 gun deaths, which is 0.833333333333% of our gun deaths. In fact, mass shootings account for less than 0.2% of our gun deaths per year. So, I mean "any is too much" yes, but it isn't near as bad as it seems. source

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

this wasn’t a normal thing until after Columbine.

Things that are relatively new, circa Columbine

  • the 24-hour news cycle

  • rage-farming as a genre of syndicated media (think: Limbaugh, Hannity, InfoWars)

  • selling fear becomes huge moneymaker for opinion programmers (Limbaugh, Hannity, Carlson, etc)

  • politics as a staple on social media comment threads

  • offshore groups (like troll farms, etc) posing as domestic political actors, targeting particular demographics

Ready access to guns is of course a problem, but it's probably made worse when all those folks with ready access to guns are bathed in fear and loathing 24/7 by millionaires making lots of money telling them things to make them or their families afraid or angry. Just a thought

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The vast majority of mentally ill people are not violent. The idea that mental illness is largely responsible for the prevalence of mass shooters contributes to the stigma already attached to mental illness.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Know what did happen shortly before Columbine? Reagan dissembled our mental health infrastructure.

I was a teen in the late 80's. Hell, I thought homelessness was a normal thing I simply hadn't heard of until MTv started flogging it.

And if the mass shooting didn't start post-Columbine...? LOL, we didn't have that word in our lexicon.

FFS, we used to able to buy shotguns in the auto parts store. But suddenly, guns and "easy access" are the problem?

Why don't you folks start a fight you have a chance of actually winning? Shut down the right-wing propaganda, hard, yesterday.

And while we're at it, I'd kill for a solid study on how many killers, including suicides, are left/right politically. We both know how that's gonna play out.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am saying that something else started it. Mental health care has been terrible for way longer than Columbine. And youre going to have to explain why there was a decade and a half gap between Reagan and this mass shooting. Dont get me wrong, Reagan was a real piece of shit but I don't think mental health or the lack of it is the major cause. Easy access to guns OTOH...

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Mass shootings pre columbine were more rare but weren't unheard of. Mostly they were belltower or highway sniper style incidents or postal related as they were severely overworked at the time.

Also, while mass shootings were more rare, not only could you get one at the hardware store you could order a full auto directly to your door with no background check or even ID for a while.

Just to add.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Up until 2000, the NRA was actually a big supporter of gun control. At that point they switched to being pretty much zero tolerance for any gun control, and even trying to dismantle gun control.

One could apply the same logic you just did to blame mental health regulations to blame this instead.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They became a lobbying group for gun manufacturers and their shareholders.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

No one is saying all mentally ill people are violent. They're saying most of these mass shooters are mentally ill. What stigma? That mentally ill people should have help available to them?

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Did you miss a century of mental healthcare development?

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its the guns. It was ALWAYS the guns. There was a significant increase in the number and severity of mass shootings after the federal assault weapons ban sunsetted. There is significant amounts of evidence that easy access to guns results in much higher homicide and mass shooting rates.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/5504/

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

It always weirds me out that the first school shooting I remember occurred a few bit over a year before Columbine. Heath High School, December 1997.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My high school school had a 1970s state championship banner for rifle shooting up in the gymnasium. It might even still be there.

[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The media circus around columbine has certainly contributed to mass shootings. Every loser knows how to be remembered now.

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
395 points (98.3% liked)

News

23397 readers
1827 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS