163
House GOP cuts Speaker Johnson’s honeymoon short
(thehill.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
163 points (94.5% liked)
politics
19097 readers
1665 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
About that time for a vote of no confidence
The House has been such a shit show that we should have a snap election and elect everyone fresh.
is that rule still in place that allows any single member to call for a motion to vacate the chair?
Far as I know, that rule hasn't changed yet.
deleted by creator
Probably for the best actually. With the beating Republicans took this week, moderates might be receptive to a compromise Democrat speaker. Otherwise, the extremist wing will utterly ruin them.
I don't think there's a single republican who would risk their next election by considering a democratic speaker, not with Trump's greasy fingerprints all over the primaries. They'll watch everything stop first. It's more likely they'll build a compromise republican that can peel off enough D votes (with significant concessions) but still carry enough Rs to win. To do so, they'd pretty much have to have every necessary legislation planned out for the next few months in order to get the votes and they have to build this coalition in secret or it's doomed.
They're threading a very fine needle. They sank a bill last week that had a lot of abortion restrictions. The moderates are basically stuck between pissing off their base and losing a primary, or pissing off the general electorate and losing the general. They're screwed either way.
They wouldn't have to vote for a Democrat speaker. If they called a new election and enough Republicans abstained or voted present. It's possible Jeffries could become speaker of the Republican held house. Without a single Republican vote. And honestly it may be the best path forward for Republicans for now. If none of them voted for him then it couldn't be held against them realistically. And they could go back to all the things they are good at in the short term. Obstruction and playing victim. It's only kicking the can down the road for them realistically. But they're gonna resist doing the right thing or facing their reckoning till they're forced to.
deleted by creator
Well, interesting times weren't going to immediately go away with Biden winning 2020 I guess.