812
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Pope Francis on Saturday forcibly removed the bishop of Tyler, Texas, a firebrand conservative prelate active on social media who has been a fierce critic of the pontiff and has come to symbolize the polarization within the U.S. Catholic hierarchy.

A one-line statement from the Vatican said Francis had “relieved” Bishop Joseph Strickland of the pastoral governance of Tyler and appointed the bishop of Austin as the temporary administrator.

Strickland, 65, has emerged as a leading critic of Francis, accusing him in a tweet earlier this year of “undermining the deposit of faith.” He has been particularly critical of Francis’ recent meeting on the future of the Catholic Church during which hot-button issues were discussed, including ways to better welcome LGBTQ+ Catholics.

Earlier this year, the Vatican sent in investigators to look into his governance of the diocese, amid reports that priests and laypeople in Tyler had complained and that he was making unorthodox claims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 98 points 1 year ago

Wait but wasn't a dogma that the word of the Pope IS the word of God? So that guy is an heretic and should be burnt at the stake

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Only when the pope chooses to speak as god, forget the fancy term.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

The Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility means that the pope has the power as head of the Church to declare something an unquestionable part of Church doctrine. This was last used to declare "the Virgin Mary went to heaven" as part of the Catholic doctrine. The "infallible" part of "papal infallibility" means that the pope's decision on the matter is final and that is the end of the discussion.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Not sure where Catholics got that. The Bible pretty clearly says Mary is burning eternally in hell for having premarital sex with the Holy Spirit.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Was it pre-marital or extra-marital?

[-] root_beer@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

Guess it’s both, isn’t it?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yes. When he’s speaking formally.

When he calls the nurse wiping his decrepit ass “a hot piece of tail”… that’s not formal doctrine. That’s just his mortal opinion. I believe the official term is when he’s speaking “ex cathedral”. There may be times broader than that, that count, but it’s a pretty obvious thing when he is.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh man but everyone tells me the Pope is so helpless and can’t stop child sex abuse in his own organisation.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The Vatican is only all-powerful in theory. The internal politics of the Catholic Church unfortunately are still a big consideration. They can only send out so many inquisitors and upend so many clergymen before internal unrest starts spreading. The worst-case scenario for the Vatican is for there to be another schism in the Church.

Many of the Church's institutions are thousands of years old and the Church is the oldest surviving Western cultural and political institution. It has a lot of baggage. I am not Catholic, but I still respect that Pope Francis has at least acknowledged the Church's wrongs and is trying to nudge it in the right direction. There is so much inertia that even the Pope can only nudge, not steer. That's why the doctrine of papal infallibility is only used in the way it is.

[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 2 points 1 year ago

I'm super curious how the various governments would handle a schism. If the churches of west america decide to break away, and the churches of the east decide to break away, but neither wants to stick with the other side, and obviously all three parties want to keep the land and buildings and everything else, how would the ownership of the various properties/organizations and all the bank accounts/employer statuses be decided?

[-] Rinox@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago

Still, you can't question the authority of the Pope and call yourself a Catholic, it's impossible for the Catholic Church

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That’s it, thank you. It’s…. Been a while.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The thing you put down your penis?

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nobody wants pain when they Ex Cathedra.

[-] GeekFTW@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Ex cathedra, iirc (or something similar).

Isn't it when he's acting as the Holy See, or something like that? I saw a video explaining it a long time ago, but I can't recall all the details.

[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 1 points 1 year ago

Sitting on the Holy Seat, informally. That's where the word cathedral comes from: the fancy seat for visiting bishops.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a heresy called sedevacantism that basically believes the last few Popes don't count because they've taken positions that the real Pope would never take.

They don't do the burning at the stake bit anymore though.

[-] Rinox@feddit.it 16 points 1 year ago

Some people are lucky that today's popes don't act like the popes of the olden days.

BTW, which one was the last true Pope in theory eyes? I bet it's the fascist one

[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

I think most of them think the last real pope was Pius XII, and yeah he was the guy who signed the Reichskonkordat with the Nazis, which required priests in Germany to take an oath of loyalty to the German Reich.

He actually did that as Secretary of State before he became pope, on behalf of the previous pope, so they were both fash.

The reason sedevacantists dislike his successor, John XXIII, is that they are really upset about the Second Vatican Council introducing ideas like "the beneficial nature of diversity" and "concern for secular human values." That's the moment when they think the church went off the rails.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Likely whichever one suits their personal world view of bigotry and fascism.

Yes, that one that supported the Nazi's in WWII and gave the names and addresses of Jews to the gestapo.

[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/mJUtMEJdvqM?si=V-7DsP_X4T64I-Km

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
812 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39112 readers
1011 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS