69
US kids want games subscriptions and virtual currency more than games this Christmas
(www.gamesindustry.biz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
69 points (89.7% liked)
Games
16751 readers
571 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I 100% agree, and I ban all of that crap from my house. We play plenty of games, but none of them have live service mechanics. The closest is I let my kids watch me play Risk, which has a BS store, but it stays out of the way.
My wife plays a live service game, but I'm working on convincing her to spend her money and time better. It's not a great example to set for our kids, but I'm putting my foot down that they don't touch any of that nonsense.
What's wrong with live service games? It just seems like a stupid category to just eliminate on principle with how many good games there are
Are you serious? They're predatory and don't respect the player's time. They're always trying to sell you something (currency, cosmetics, map packs, etc), and they build a sense of FOMO if you don't play every day (daily quests, updates, etc).
There are tons of great games out there that don't have that crap, and I'm happy to buy them for my kids. They have a variety of switch and PC games that aren't live service the they love.
I've never felt like Tf2 and league don't respect my time. Just because some games are shit, doesn't mean they all are
Agreed, I think those are reasonable. However, I don't want my kids playing TF2 because there's a ton of cheaters and I hear it can be a bit toxic (I haven't played recently at all), and probably not League because of the MTX to buy heroes (though that's far better than most other live service games). They can play those games when they get a bit older (again, my kids are <10).
But most other F2P games are unacceptable IMO, especially when there are much better paid games without all that nonsense.
Yeah, I totally get not wanting kids to play online games.
The main reason I wanted to bring these things up is because it seems you have more of a problem with live service games done poorly rather than with the principle of them on their own.
Just because there are a few decent live service games doesn't change the fact that the model is predatory, just like a few good mobile games existing doesn't change the fact that mobile gaming is a cesspool of predatory games.
I will always prefer games without MTX to games with them. For every good F2P game (i.e. games that respect the player's time, aren't pay-to-win, etc), I can point to several popular, predatory games. The ratio for popular paid games is much better.
So a handful of decent games doesn't mean the model isn't terrible, it just means there are some exceptions. And I'm absolutely willing to make exceptions to my rules.