27

unfortunate

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Profit is theft not property smh

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Private property/capital can be understood as theft because it requires an enclosure of the commons at its root, which is done by force more often than not.

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

That's critique is more appropriate for something like land, but owning cnc machine and a patent doesn't translate to theft. the fact that workers who do stuff on these machines can't afford what they make does

[-] theposterformerlyknownasgood@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay Rousseau, but Marx' s argument is not that property isn't theft, but that that the existence of the term "Theft" requires accepting that property is valid

[-] Virulent@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

Profit is not theft either. The point of capital vol 1 is that exploitation happens without any theft. Even an ideal, "fair" capitalism is still based on exploitation.

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

Well, yes, but better fit than property.

Plus at some point on the sliding scale of worker not getting full compensation -> peasant paying 60 % to the lord -> slave paying everything and receiving food as recompense for their labor, you can feasibly argue about theft somewhere round peasant mark.

Of course its not legally defined theft, cause tools of the master and law in its majestic equality blah blah

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13519 readers
970 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS