229
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 77 points 1 year ago

I remember the first time I saw Doom on the SNES. It was the most realistic thing I'd seen a computer render, the equivalent of playing the latest FPS game. Then I got a Nintendo 64 and Super Mario was the most realistic thing I've seen. Each successive generation of game has been both the most realistic thing I've seen and the theoretical limit of realism for computer graphics. Something makes me unable to imagine a higher level of fidelity than 2024 releases without it just becoming haptic sensors, and if I see a female character in that 2024 game it's as realistic as a body can get. While I didn't play Tomb Raider because CDs were obnoxious, I remember the characters in Golden Eye and Perfect Dark being vaguely attractive to a child who had never seen a naked woman.

[-] Sinistar@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago

a higher level of fidelity than 2024 releases

We've reached a point where the major bottleneck on realism isn't the hardware you run on, it's the size of your dev team and the amount of time you spend working on your graphics. That's part of why triple ayyyyyyyyyy games are so much more expensive to make than they need to be, because they're throwing money at diminishing returns and they always have to outdo the last game that came out.

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Halving the size of the triangles each generation eventually hits a point where the difference is negligible.

load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
229 points (100.0% liked)

games

20966 readers
233 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS