Not Malaysia-specific, but extremely relevant.
A reverse effect to traffic generation is the phenomenon of “traffic evaporation”: traffic that disappears when road space is reallocated from private vehicles to more sustainable modes of transport like walking, cycling and public transportation. While traffic evaporation has been well-documented for more than 20 years, most decision- and opinion-makers are still under the impression that reducing car lanes will make traffic worse.
All this does not mean that cities don’t require adequate road connectivity among rural areas and other cities. But reducing road space for cars in denser areas while improving areas for walking, cycling and public transportation clearly does not produce the chaos many believe it will. It is actually a more sustainable and equitable way of improving mobility in dense and fast-growing cities
In KL, even crowded tourist spots like Bukit Bintang, Petaling Street and Jalan Alor have to make way for traffic.
I really think the pavi area especially needs to bite the bullet and just make it pedestrian only. It's got the infra for it + the mix of shops + the MRT dekat kompleks kraftangan is already open. It's literally the only enclosure (other than the dataran side) that I can really see little issue in rerouting car traffic.
Pudu/Kotaraya side is still iffy, that's true.
DBKL : sure I’ll let pedestrians walk like they own the streets. Imma build a flyover for CARS ! Hehehehe
Wah I can literally imagine this...
Important lifehack is you can use the Banyan Tree to cross to Pavilion from this station. It's not exclusively for guests.
Yeah I’m not sure how it’ll affect the traffic but it’s the most obvious location. That said, flashback to an old meeting that mentioned why there are no food stalls in that area… (though looks like there have been some food stall area allowed there since then)
Yah the human movement dynamics couldn't deny the food stalls being there... Hence, you see my point!