525
submitted 9 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

Justice Amanda Yip lifted the reporting restrictions on naming the killers of 16-year-old Brianna Ghey. They were identified at Manchester Crown Court as Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Ratcliffe.

The horrific murder shocked the nation. Ghey was stabbed with a hunting knife 28 times in her head, neck, chest and back in broad daylight after being lured to a park in the town of Warrington on Feb. 11, 2023.

Yip handed Ratcliffe and Jenkinson a mandatory life sentence, and ordered them to serve a minimum term of 20 and 22 years, respectively, before they could be eligible for parole. If they had been adults — over the age of 18 — they would have faced much longer minimum terms. They will be transferred to adult prisons when they turn 18. Neither showed no visible reaction on being sentenced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 11 points 9 months ago

Minimum of only 20 years though before eligible for parole

[-] UnfortunateDoorHinge@aussie.zone 49 points 9 months ago

They're minors. In the UK and most of the developed world, you cannot give life without parole to a minor.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 10 points 9 months ago

Idk I think people who murder a girl in cold blood shouldn't ever be allowed to participate in society, but that's just me.

[-] Whattrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

They only get out on parole if the board (or whatever the UK's equivalent is) believes they have learned a lesson and are safe to reenter society. If not then they stay until the next board meeting. I have a hard time imagining they would get out after 20 years for murder without the board being pretty damn sure they are no longer a danger to society.

As gross and heinous as these crimes are, I will never favor life-without-parole or the death penalty for minors.

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

if rehabilitation is possible, there is no real benefit to society to just keep folks in prison indefinitely, and in fact refusing to accept change for the better disincentivises folks from doing so

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website -2 points 9 months ago

Not all crimes can be rehabilitated. I consider a hate based murder to be one of them.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Any evidence to back that up?

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago
[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website -2 points 9 months ago
[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

20 years is a looooong time when you're 16. They've lost their entire young adulthood and then some

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

They will be fine. Terf Island will consider them political prisoners.

[-] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 26 points 9 months ago

They'll be on licence for the rest of their lives following that though. The minimum term on a life sentence is just the custodial part.

[-] SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

on licence. right, what's that, then? will they have any other sort of restrictions once they get out at minimum 36?

[-] irq0@infosec.pub 33 points 9 months ago

The 20 years is the minimum time they'll do in prison.

After the 20 years they'll be eligible for parole. If, and only if, the board decides that it's safe for them to be released will they do so.

If they are released they will be in license. This means they are subject to prison recall without trial should they pose any risk to the public. The license may also impose additional restrictions such as regular therapy appointments, restrictions on leaving the country etc. These conditions will be imposed for life. Breaking any of these restrictions would also result in a recall to prison.

If the parole board decides that it's not safe to release them, then they'll remain in prison. They may very well remain in prison for their entire life.

[-] SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

heh. TIL. thanks for that!

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

That's standard in the UK. Our justice system views rehabilitation as the ultimate goal, not punishment. They will serve this as a minimum, but will likely never see life outside of a cell based on their reaction to being sentenced.

Even after parole, their life will forever be scrutinised by law enforcement and medical examiners to determine their mental state. Anything that doesn't scream "normal member of society" puts them back in jail.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah I agree with rehabilitation for 99% of crimes and laud the European models as generally better than the American one.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
525 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39104 readers
1872 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS