90
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by RION@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

It will take hold of you, and you will regret it's absence

- a stupid idiot who thought they could explain why arbitrary age limits are a poor heuristic for experience to a /r/politics user

god typing that out really sells the stupid idiot part huh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not defending any liberal democracy here. Any system where the people in charge of advancement are the ones with a shot at that advancement, there'll be conflicts of interest like this. If a constitutional amendment barring old people from something went in front of a room full of old people who happen to be potentials, that thing's getting shot down faster than a bolt of lightning.

I will only argue in the hypothetical, that there's no test for youthful inexperience, but cognitive decline can be tested. Although that fact is also quite meaningless in a system where the doctor applying the test can be bought off.

My point is actually capitalism bad, a socialist country will figure this stuff out one way or another.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
90 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13541 readers
838 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS