299
submitted 8 months ago by CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Right. And the limit of the law, in this case, is lethal injection.

Which is cruel. Even if he specifically wants it. For reasons I explain.

I don’t make up the rules, man. But you still haven’t said what would be the ideal in this situation.

The ideal would be to do what every other civilized country on the planet does and not execute people. Even Anders Breivik wasn't executed and he killed 77 people, many of them children. And no one in Norway who had any real influence seriously discussed bringing back the death penalty just for him. Because it is cruel.

Even SCOTUS decided it was cruel and halted it until they reversed their decision.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furman_v._Georgia

You’d still have to consider the victims in this decision, so I’m curious to know how you’d do it.

Our justice system is not about retribution. It has never been about retribution. Retribution is also unconstitutional for the same reason.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Anders Breivik

Not to go off-topic, but that Nazi never asked to be put to death. It seems like the only complaint he's made about his sentence is that the Playstation he uses while in prison is outdated, and that he doesn't get more time to make phone calls.

[death by lethal injection] Which is cruel. Even if he specifically wants it.

Do you view medically assisted suicide as cruel?

If Creech asked for death by lethal injection as a form of assisted suicide, would granting that not be the embodiment of compassion towards him?

Cruelty implies that extreme unkindness is willingly being inflicted upon another person or animal with the desire to cause pain and suffering.

This definition does not match what we see here.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Do you view medically assisted suicide as cruel?

After a doctor's assessment? No. He did not undergo such an assessment.

There's a reason why medical professionals do not assist with executions.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

There’s a reason why medical professionals do not assist with executions.

I hate to break it to you, but the article quite literally says that "medical team members" were responsible for assisting in getting the IV line into Creech.

Harvard also says that physicians do assist (SOURCE)

And even this cardiologist says it's better that they do than not, even though he is against capital punishment.

It's certainly a debated topic in the realm of ethics, no doubt, but it still happens.

But getting back to my question:

If medically assisted suicide is not cruel, and Creech requested that he wanted to die via lethal injection (medically assisted suicide, since it was at his request), where do we have a problem?

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
299 points (97.5% liked)

News

23301 readers
1171 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS