Supreme Court (6-3) allows Texas to enforce immigration law (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"The court gives a green light to a law that will upend the longstanding federal-state balance of power and sow chaos," liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissenting opinion. Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson also objected to the decision.

The majority did not explain its reasoning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 68 points 8 months ago

the majority did not explain its reasoning

There we go, this is the kind of nazi scotus bullshit i expected.

[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

To be fair, this is pretty common with all SC justices. Their decisions are often completely unsupported with rational argument, they'll just make a statement and proceed as though it were absolutely true. They're not really intellectual titans or even particularly strong legal minds.

edit: the 5-4 podcast is really good at going through a SC case every episode and really drawing out what complete jokes most SC justices are, making first year 1L mistakes isn't out of the ordinary for the highest court of the land.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 27 points 8 months ago

To be honest - when I saw that I realized my GOP justices jokes have lacked panache and zing. My go-to has been to give an explanation even if it was a basic as that they pulled a premise out of thin air or out of their ass. I didn't realize that instead I could go with the simple, darkly hilarious, and far funnier "the majority did not explain its reasoning".