267
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Dali was reportedly detained in Belgium after scraping side of quay and significantly damaging part of hull in good weather

The same vessel that hit the Baltimore Key Bridge on Tuesday, destroying it and sending people and vehicles tumbling into the water, was also involved in a collision while leaving the port of Antwerp, Belgium, in 2016.

According to Vessel Finder and the maritime incident archive Shipwrecklog, the Dali – a 948ft (290-meter) cargo ship with a capacity of 10,000 containers – was leaving the container terminal of Antwerp heading to Bremerhaven.

As it did so, its bow reportedly swung around, causing the stern to scrape the side of the quay, significantly damaging several meters of the hull.

The ship was reportedly detained by authorities afterward and docked in Deurganckdok, Belgium. There were reportedly no injuries or adverse pollution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 84 points 7 months ago

I'm not sure what this implies. Defective ship? Was it the same captain, 8 years later? What's going on here?

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 115 points 7 months ago

Defective management seems more like it. Poor maintenance, overworked crews, etc.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 53 points 7 months ago

The increase of “accidents of chance” infers that maybe they aren’t so “of chance”, basically

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Per USA Today

The ship that struck the Francis Key Bridge in Baltimore Tuesday apparently lost power a few minutes before drifting into the structure collapsing a huge span and likely killing several people, according to a U.S official who was not authorized to speak publicly

I would bet management/owners have refused to pay for basic maintenance over crew objections and that's going to be a direct cause of this accident

e; better source, "Cargo ship lost power and issued mayday before hitting Baltimore bridge, governor says"

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago

I really, really doubt a ship they expect to cross oceans to make money, was skimping on maintenance. I could be wrong, i mean, look at fucking boeing, but it's cheaper to maintain your shit than deal with the consequences, even when the consequences are simply a break down, not this. and it's MAERSK.they have money.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 15 points 7 months ago

I got thru the 'friends network' that the ship had lost power, and put out a 'mayday' call. This explains why so few cars were on the bridge at the moment of the collision.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 7 months ago

The BBC have a video of the full thing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-68667813

There's maybe a minute between power going out and the collision. Still cars going over at that point. Google Street View doesn't seem to show any lights or barriers that could have been used, and I don't know anyone that can scramble a road black that fast. That's a half mile long bridge. They had no chance.

The reason there's so few deaths is just because it was the middle of the night.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wikipedia says 1.6 miles. So it was already heading towards the support when power went out? Ah, I see power went out twice. I had also noted the black smoke in the first video I saw.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago

The bit that actually collapsed was half a mile long. The rest seems to still be standing, so anybody on that bit would have been alright.

Hard to tell the path of the ship from that compressed angle tbh, or how far away it was. Dunno what anyone is supposed to do about it with a few minutes notice like that.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 7 months ago

the black smoke is likely full throttle upon regaining power to attempt avoiding the structure.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 9 points 7 months ago

It was also 1:30 am, and work crews were pouring concrete fixing the bridge at the time. That probably meant at least some kind of reduced traffic during the night work I would think.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There would have been a police detail on the bridge with the construction crew. Which is incredibly fortunate. Sounds like they were in the best place they could be for such a tragedy.

It’s a shame they couldn’t help more of the workers escape.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 18 points 7 months ago

At most, it would reflect poorly on the operator. It's almost certainly not the same captain, since they move around pretty frequently. May or may not be the same engine crew responsible for maintenance. Someone else said they had two pilots on board in this incident, so it's extremely unlikely to be an issue with the regular deck officer staff. My money is pure coincidence. You spend enough time operating, you're bound to have incidents. They're just reporting on it because it's extra ad views for people whose curiosity is piqued.

[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 13 points 7 months ago

Ships obviously haunted by a vengeful spirit intent on causing as much damage as it can.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 9 points 7 months ago

You can see that the vengeful spirit tore a hole in the side of the ship, and has escaped. So everything's fine now. Just need a new bridge.

[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

How do we know the spirit didn't enter another ship? All we can do is hope that it finished what it needed to and has moved on.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 3 points 7 months ago

Is this really all we can do?

[-] marduk@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 months ago
[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago
[-] deania@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If your hot-dog tastes

Like a piece of wood

Who're you gonna call?

GHOST MUSTARD!

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 2 points 7 months ago

I did ask Albert to ask his friend Maersk. And I'm twiddling my thumbs. Like a lot. ;-)

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

I think I heard on the news that, for today's incident, a harbor pilot was in control of the ship at the time of the accident.

Details are starting to suggest the ship lost power, and thus control, before hitting the bridge.

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
267 points (97.5% liked)

News

23267 readers
4050 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS