As someone that always got the creeps from this guy and got tired of seeing him all over social media promoting his nonsense with his whole "I'm a professor at Stanford" act, this article is cathartic and somewhat vindicating to read.
The long and the short of it is that while preaching self control, cutting out toxicity from your life, and creating peace, he proceeded to have affairs with five or six different women at the same time, with unprotected sex and potential spreading of STDs/STIs, along with cheating on the woman he was trying to have a child with, as well as ghosting pretty much everyone in his life constantly. He also made up a dubious backstory to hide the nepotism that allowed him to have a career at Stanford:
What does seem certain is that in his adolescence, Andrew became a regular consumer of talk therapy. In therapy, one learns to tell stories about one’s experience. A story one could tell is: I overcame immense odds to be where I am. Another is: The son of a Stanford professor, born at Stanford Hospital, grows up to be a Stanford professor.
For context with this paragraph, Huberman talks about the benefits of therapy all the time:
Andrew’s relationship to therapy remains intriguing. “We were at dinner once,” says Eve, “and he told me something personal, and I suggested he talk to his therapist. He laughed it off like that wasn’t ever going to happen, so I asked him if he lied to his therapist. He told me he did all the time.”
As a summary for how his podcast is filled with projection:
With repeated listening to the podcast, one discerns a man undergoing, in public, an effort to understand himself. There are hours of talking about addiction, trauma, dopamine, and fear. Narcissism comes up consistently. One can see attempts to understand and also places where those attempts swerve into self-indulgence.
I definitely want to take psychological advice from a narcissistic sociopath who peddles Joe Rogan muscle powder
Yeah and Huberman is definitely knowledgeable enough to know that the "muscle powder" is completely ineffective in dosage and a scam, yet he still promoted it. That's just selling out.
As for his psychological advice, as I've said it always came across as preachy and the words of someone who protests too much.
The bit in the article where he spent 9 minutes armchair diagnosing a colleague who sent him a terse message for his flakiness is telling
If I ever encountered this guy in YT clips I certainly dismissed him as a grifter and forgot his face straight away