210
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

According to the ModifyNOTA website, fewer than 1% of registered organ donors die in such a way that enables their kidneys to be harvested. Also, a living-donor kidney lasts twice as long on average as a deceased-donor kidney.

Yes it would definitely help to make organ donation opt-out, and we should totally do that, but they're saying this still wouldn't be enough.

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 1 points 7 months ago

your first sentence has nothing to do with what i said because those people already registered. the stat you want is people who are not donors dying in a way that we could've used their organs but didn't.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

that would presumably also be <1%, wouldn't it?

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 1 points 7 months ago

i wouldn't make that kind of assumption about the behavior of the two groups

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

I would make this assumption in this case.

You think people who would opt-in register for organ donation would be less likely to die in a way compatible with kidney harvesting than others?

I think it's somewhat unlikely that whether or not someone registers to be an organ donor would affect how they are likely to die, but if it did, I would wager that registered organ donors are more likely to die in a way that enables their kidneys to be harvested than others. In any case, I doubt the difference is more than, say, a factor of 2.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
210 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13533 readers
960 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS