150
submitted 1 year ago by geek_sheikh@lemmy.world to c/til@lemmy.world

From the Wiki: According to former Death Row Records chief engineer Rick Clifford, George Lucas was eyeing Tupac to star in his return to the "Star Wars" saga. Lucas had asked Jackson to ask Shakur to audition but due to Shakur's untimely death the role ultimately went to Samuel L. Jackson. The character's bald appearance could have also been an homage to Shakur.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago

I don't think Samuel L Jackson really felt the burden, and i doubt Tupac would have either

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

tbf, he was part of it. That was one of the weakest performances he's ever phoned in. His Mace Windu barely feels like he even actually cares. Some of his line deliveries too, are kinda ... odd?

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

no character development, not relatable. blame the source material, not the actor this time.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

I mean, his actual acting was fairly wooden as well. He's a good actor, he was capable of much better in that situation.

[-] Cranialduggery@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

I think all of that was him being directed to playing out a role as a Master Jedi. You have to remember before those movies the only actors that were able to really flesh out how a Jedi acts is Alec Guiness as obi wan and a puppet name Yoda. It was new territory. So you get this plain mannerism that is calm but absolute. Samuel was trying to convey that somehow and it just came out odd, probably partly because it was motherfukkin Samuel L Jackson doing it. Where as when Alec Guiness did it, the oddness just worked with the actor.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

It also just doesn't play to Jackson's strengths at all, which are mostly in his skill with dialogue and emotion. I don't blame him exclusively for it, but it was unquestionably a terrible acting performance that was delivered.

It was probably dozens of people's faults, of which he is just one.

[-] hungry_freaks_daddy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

One of the worst casting decisions ever.

He should have been cast as one of the roughest, toughest, meanest drifter/scoundrel type characters ever. It would have been amazing if he was the grittier, menacing Han Solo character who protects anakin at all costs.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Wesley Snipes could've pulled off Windu. He brings the energy, and has the martial arts background to help convincingly pull off the tranquil master trope when he wants.

[-] Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

True, but my point still stands, his career was not really hurt by his involvement or performance in the movies

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it didn't hurt many careers at all, now that you mention it. Catapulted Natalie Portman's, even. Though she actually did do a pretty good job as Padme.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
150 points (94.1% liked)

Today I Learned

17769 readers
44 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS