910
  • Elon Musk accused of illegally selling $7.5 billion in Tesla stock in Q4 2022.
  • Lawsuit alleges Musk and board violated fiduciary duties by selling shares ahead of disappointing vehicle sales data.
  • Shareholder seeks disgorgement of $3 billion in illegal gains and damages from directors for reckless behavior.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 282 points 3 months ago

Isn't that the definition of insider trading? Lock him up like Martha, she did way less and served time in a prison resort.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 50 points 3 months ago

I need to look up how "insider trading" even works.

When you are the CEO, and you make decisions, and you own your own stock - wouldn't everything you ever do be with insider info? It is just honor system pinky-promise to act in good faith? I mean that sounds super effective.

[-] teletext@reddthat.com 109 points 3 months ago

Normally you publicly say looong in advance, like at least half a year in advance, that you plan to sell this amount of shares at this point in time. No more, no less, not earlier, not later, no backsies.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well no, there is backsies. You can rescind your intent to sell within a couple days. What most CEOs do is set up regular sells every month way in advance, then choose not to sell unless its opportune at the last minute. If that sounds like it completely defeats the purpose of the rule in the first place, yep! The system is rigged.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Wouldn’t say completely. The notice of intent to sell is not there to prevent CEOs from selling when they want to, it’s to notify you that they could sell this much if they wanted to.

The purpose is just to say that you need to be prepared for a potential sale. If the CEO keeps backing out of a sale, that does hurt your ability to predict when they will but not how much they could sell and therefore how much those sales could potentially affect your investment.

All of that is strategic because otherwise investors could conceivably do the opposite and sell before the CEO is forced to sell and then buy his shares at a lower price. That would mean the stock would tank every time the CEO went to sell. The problem exists because most of the solutions are even worse

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

That's a fair point, thank you! I was mostly commenting because that rule gets brought up every time someone talks about insider trading (and musk specifically) as a defense and it's deeply irritating. It makes sense the rule is more about not hobbling CEO investment than insider trading since it really doesn't do much to prevent the latter.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago

The problem exists because most of the solutions are even worse

Everything you said makes a lot of sense, but this drives it home... The stock market is so unbelievably ridiculous. It's just unmanageable, it's such a simple idea with such horrible effects it might be a great filter

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 months ago

At my workplace we are only allowed to sell stocks within certain windows, usually it's a brief period immediately after we publicly release earnings. I think for higher ups it's even more restrictive.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We had a 2 week window 2 or 3 days after earnings were released.

Edit: You could preschedule sales though like recurring once a month, but it wouldn't take effect immediately. I can't remember what the delay on that was, but it might have been starting after the next earnings?

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I've known people at IC level sell outside of windows and barely get a mention. Some people have odd vesting schedules for things like RSU's, so sometimes it's unavoidable.

At higher levels, it's locked down considerably. My old director said that he had to have a meeting to go through a sale of his stock, so that it could be approved to be out of a window of potential releases in the company outside of his own division. I imagine that at VP+ level you need accountants just to handle what is a few clicks for an average corp worker.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 39 points 3 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

"Felonious Musk" might be a good nickname.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 18 points 3 months ago

That's only the 5th time he commits fraud. He has been at court several times because of his actions. It seems no one really wants to arrest him

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

He should run for president. He can claim the long form version of his birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii.

[-] exanime@lemmy.today 18 points 3 months ago

Yes but you see, he is a billionaire... Insider trading and other laws are for the pauper rich

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I love how resort is tacked on there at the very end. Like you read it in a quiter voice.

[-] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Well, she did spend time in Club Fed

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
910 points (98.7% liked)

News

22876 readers
3831 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS