161
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Comp4@hexbear.net 34 points 4 months ago

Now im not a solarpunk fan myself but I have seen many leftwing/leftish people seen positive on it. Is it good / bad ? I havent really looked into it beyond surface level.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 73 points 4 months ago

IMO it's good at its roots but can be easily coopted, it's like cottagecore in that sense.

[-] Boise_Idaho@hexbear.net 48 points 4 months ago

Twitter solarpunk is cooked because they all use screenshots from the same yogurt ad with lines like "a business is only as good as its people" lmao

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 43 points 4 months ago

Exactly, it's basically been reduced down to just the aesthetics which can be readily repackaged and recuperated. It's a floating signifier, waiting for a brand to attach to and be capitalized on. But since there's something fundamentally good at its core, I still see value in it.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 38 points 4 months ago

Goblincore stay winning- the nouveau art nouveau

[-] Comp4@hexbear.net 36 points 4 months ago

Sorry for being a boomer mom-type character archetype. Could you explain how solarpunk and cottagecore connect and why they are good but can be coopted? I honestly need to google cottagecore again; I remember hearing the word, but I'm not that online yet, I guess.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 89 points 4 months ago

Cottagecore was a lesbian aesthetic about escaping heteronormative society and going off grid. It got turned into a tradwife aesthetic about neo lebensraum. Solarpunk is similar, but the way it gets coopted is via green capitalism washing away the revolutionary parts of solarpunk and replacing them with consumerism of the eco friendly variety.

[-] Comp4@hexbear.net 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Thank you, that makes sense. It's nice to see young people respect their elders :^)

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago
[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

I think if I just continue cooking my mind with enough Brace rants I'll eventually become a good version of BMF

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The sad part for me is that BMF was always completely legible to me, but I don't think I can cook myself enough to ever actually post like that because I despise obscure jargonism.

Please continue your journey to become whitehat BMF.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

Nah I think what set BMF apart was not so much the jargon, but assuming that the reader could keep up with immense amounts of subtext and implied meaning; usually their posts were long sequences of quotations followed by replies that imply several layers of contradicting and layered cultural criticisms, which you could only keep up with if you synchronized your mind to theirs in a fundamental way.

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

Meh, I always thought everything was pretty straight forward and textual, maybe I misinterpretated it.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

https://old.reddit.com/r/TrueAnon/comments/1dqmbu1/when_the_heavens_gate_ufo_cult_did_a_mass_suicide/

All 39 were dressed in identical black shirts and sweat pants, brand new black-and-white Nike Decades athletic shoes, and armband patches reading "Heaven's Gate Away Team" (one of many instances of the group's use of the nomenclature of the fictional universe of Star Trek).

least psychotic Captain Janeway stans

There's at least 4 layers of decoding necessary to parse this post.

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

Idk, it's mostly just knowing about Heaven's Gate and their idiosyncratic pop culture use, with abit of internet slang. It's just three layers of pop culture, and one layer of UFO death cult culture. I guess I'm so used to it I barely even register it as sub-text. Yikes.

But also, haven't read this one before! Yet another fascinating BMF point, though one I have heard expressed before.

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is sounding like the Pynchon of posting.

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

Wait the lesbians did cottagecore first? Thats cool and makes me feel better about it. There's a minecraft youtuber I like called GeminiTay who's wlw and before she came out she was doing Cottagecore builds in Minecraft and people found it unsuprising when she came out as bi because of this lol.

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 months ago

I think a really strong example of this is the fact that the most popular thing to showcase the solarpunk aesthetic is a freaking ad for a yoghurt brand that comes in disposable plastic packaging…

[-] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

Tradwives really out here dressing like lesbians, except much like a heterosexual trad-douche, they really struggle with like everything aesthetically

[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

It's alright, auntie, lol.

For cottagecore - I think it's the fascist idealization of a past that never really existed. I've never really thought about the connection between cottagecore and solar punk, but I could see both having a twee idealized rural life aesthetic (with solar punk adding a dash of sci-fi)

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I wouldn't say it's hitlerite adjacent, but it's full idealism - impossible under capitalism and unnecessary under socialism. Also most of solarpunk art is really bad if you look at it second time - shitty infrastructure, rotting plant matter everywhere, erosion of cityspaces, insane amounts of labour to maintain it, disconnected primitivism, strong postapo ruin vibes, and this is even before we talk about AI artefacts in said pics.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago

insane amounts of labour to maintain it

Labour has never been the problem. It’s whether those maintaining it socially reproduce capitalism, or socialism/communism/anarchy.

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago

I feel like even if we had communism tomorrow we’d still have discussions on if X thing is worth doing labor wise or if that labor could be used more effectively doing something else. It’s not like having a bunch of vining plants on every building is inherently a good thing. Those plants are going to want water from somewhere and they’ll probably get it from the sewer system or something which means clogged drains everywhere.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 4 months ago

Looks more like utopia.

[-] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

There are anarchist ultra-strains of solarpunk that straight up want to ban fertilizer and stuff as soon as possible and let the food system collapse before an alternative is made to feed everyone. And I don't mean in an indirect way, I mean they admit this.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 months ago

Shows how that's just pure vibes and idealism. The result would be more like cannibalpunk when 8 billion humans suddenly reverting to subsistence farming.

[-] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

Survival of thr fittest oh yeah totally fine

[-] booty@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago

insane amounts of labour to maintain it

Ok I'm only a little familiar with this aesthetic and its art, but I always thought the idea was that it isn't being actively maintained. Like the art I saw seemed to imply a vaguely socialist society rising up out of the overgrown ruins after the apocalypse in a capitalist one. The idea being that civilization doesn't necessarily mean the destruction of all existing life within it, that you can build a new society and let the plants that are already there just continue being there.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

but I always thought the idea was that it isn’t being actively maintained

That would be logical, but unfortunately it is not so. On the art of cities/towns you have greenery absolutely everywhere, roads, roofs, houses, walls, tons of flower pots and other bigger and smaller containers. It again shows how idealist vision this is and how they know shit about greenery in city spaces, all this would very quickly just wither and die without constant care and the amount of plants needing that care means the labour would been simply crazy, especially that on the art if anyone is even doing that is always by hand. Even moderate amount of city greenery we have in some cities today need quite a lot of care. Alternatively they could make it less maintained by planting some crazy invasive species which would overgrown everything and look like Angkor Wat before rediscovery but that's not possible under most climates and not only monoculture weed is not close to the idea, but again, the erosion of cityspace would be huge.
Also there is a thing that solarpunk is nearly always vision of at least harshly understood degrowth if not outright primitivism and you have the full vision closer to postapo disaster than to any socialism.

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 33 points 4 months ago

It's an aesthetic. And yes aesthetics are political, but I think this is one of those ones that can go either way, in fact I feel that way about most "Punk" genres. There's been progressive and reactionary cyberpunk, steampunk, whatever.

Some of solar punk seems to be "hey what if we did Soviet brutalist commie blocks but with more greenery", so a more naturalistic and whimsical version of dense, organized, urban-proletariat society, which I think is kinda cool. Other times it looks more like an idealized version of what "techno-feudalism" would look like, a quaint, pastoral, sustainable version of being petite-bourgeois.

[-] rwhitisissle@lemy.lol 20 points 4 months ago

a quaint, pastoral, sustainable version of being petite-bourgeois.

Or as I like to call it, "Hobbitcore."

[-] a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago

It's also telling that one of the major artworks used to "promote" the aesthetic is literally a yoghurt commercial, but since it's a cute animation, it gets a pass.

[-] itappearsthat@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago

I think it's fine. The societal changes necessary to address climate change are so wild that people literally lack capacity to imagine them. Solarpunk is an art genre to fill in that space.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago

Solarpunk is good this is internet poisoning.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
161 points (94.5% liked)

games

20526 readers
379 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS