91
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by iridaniotter@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Supreme Court ruled the President gets near absolute immunity and can't have evidence brought forth against him lmaoo

Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.

Testimony or private records of the President or his advisers probing such conduct may not be admitted as evidence at trial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

https://youtu.be/dMt8qCl5fPk but when the President does it, that means it is not illegal

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
91 points (98.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13517 readers
1334 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS