844

Explain that, science nerds! (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

163 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 months ago

That's very lovely, but ultimately egotistical. I mean, I romanticise about it too, but the universe ultimately just... is. The only severity is for us humans. No other species has a sense of "species" as a community AFAIK. Heck, even humans have a terrible track record. We can't even seem to sterilise machines we sent to space no matter how hard we try, even after being exposed to outer space. That's the evidence we have.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

From our perspective, only human eyes record history. Without us around to experience and document the universe, is it any different from not existing at all? It doesn't matter that the universe is. What is is if there is nothing around to define it?

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

I just don't really understand the point of the question. I care about "the planet" because I feel empathy for my fellow humans and would like to leave a healthy environment for the future generations to come. I won't leave any offspring. So when I die, my linage ends. After I die I will stop experiencing anything. And yet I still care. But I only care because my brain is wired to feel empathy.

I don't care at all that the universe might have no one to experience it when our sun blows up. As statistically unlikely as that might be.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I mean you dont have to care. I do. I care that this vast universe might never been seen by human eyes. Because I feel like it is our duty to experience and record as much of this as possible. I truly believe we are the universe experiencing itself, and dammit we better experience it all.