976
submitted 2 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

"And so I come full circle on this response and just want to encourage you with some substance that we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be," he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] newtraditionalists@kbin.melroy.org 78 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Do you all remember how quickly they backed down as soon as ashley babbit was shot? (yes I know I spelled it wrong, I don't care to honor that piece of trash). A whole crowd of these fuckers. and presumably the most rabid of them, their infantry if you will. These are the cultists who spent money, time, and energy to be there. So they are also the ones with means. Also, presumably a bunch of them were carrying concealed weapons. Then one person gets shot and the entire thing crumbles. Cowards. Through and through cowards. And they think they can win a war?

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The reaction of everyone when the shot is fired was absolutely telling. The coward that was right next to her turns and ran. Didn't even help her or charge an attack with the absolutely massive numbers they had. They were there, at the heart of it all and they turned around and ran because the violence became real and was directed at them.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 years ago

Except the ones who pointed at her like chimps and took out their cell phones to record her dying.

Not one of them offered any first aid.

[-] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago

You can't really expect empathy from that crowd.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

I like the way I once saw it summarized for a non-American person asking about J6:

Supporters of the fascist ex-President form angry mob threatening to kill politicians; they end up killing four police officers and one of themselves then run away.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

I'm not defending those traitors, but they didn't kill 4 police. This is from the wiki on the event.

"Within 36 hours, five people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, and three died of natural causes, including a police officer. Many people were injured, including 174 police officers. Four officers who responded to the attack died by suicide within seven months."

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 34 points 2 years ago

A 42 year old having a stroke after being sprayed with pepper spray and hit on the head with a fire extinguisher is not dying of natural causes.

[-] ramirezmike@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago
[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago

The brain bouncing against the inside of the skull due to blunt force trauma is technically a natural cause, if you cross your eyes

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's simple: Trump wins, they win (unless he fucks it up, which he probably will).

Trump loses, they lose no matter how violent they get.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Trump loses, they lose

They've been on this shit since the Confederate Era. Trump is just the latest in a long line of fascist bannermen.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Well, if you want the history of the Heritage Foundation, look back to the 70's. Supreme Court Justice Lewis F. Powell penned a memo to the US Chamber of Commerce titled "Attack on the American Free Enterprise System" in 1970, and in this memo, he detailed his concern that America's best and brightest students were becoming anti-business because of our involvement in Vietnam. Powell’s agenda included getting wealthy conservatives to set up professorships, setting up institutes on and off campus where intellectuals would write books from a conservative business perspective, and setting up think tanks. Three years later, the Heritage Foundation was founded.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Narrator: They did not win. Not even when they won. For they did not know or understand governance.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

And they never should have gotten that far IMO.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trump refused to call in the same National Guard that has beaten up the BLM protesters the summer before.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago

I mean, when somebody says a threat of such kind in a situation which doesn't yet warrant it, it's clear they are cowards.

Make no mistake - that bloodshed they want to be done by police, national guard and such. Not their own supporters. Cause no person who says such things first wants to be shot back at.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
976 points (98.4% liked)

News

35714 readers
851 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS