817
submitted 4 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 44 points 4 months ago

And is anyone going to do anything about this man?

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 23 points 4 months ago

The Supreme Court just granted immunity to President Biden, so he can send him and the other traitors to Guantanamo without fear of legal repercussions. Of course not, nothing’s going to happen.

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This seems to be a common misconception.

The Supreme Court did not give Biden immunity. They gave the president immunity for carrying out official acts. Who determines what an official act is? The Supreme Court.

Biden doesn't have immunity. I'd argue he doesn't have immunity as president, either.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 11 points 4 months ago

That’s the thing about this though. I’d like to see them try to prevent that from within Guantanamo. It’s not legal neither moral, yet it can’t be stopped using the law.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

True, but Republicans seem to have taken the position that you can do whatever you want while the consequences work their way through the courts.

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

And if Biden were a conservative he'd have immunity.

Biden would die of old age before he ever saw a prison cell.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

So... next week?

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

He has it if he wants it. He just has to gulag the justices. By the time the case makes it to the supreme court, it's all his own people. "Oh why yes, a president certainly can gulag whoever he deems an enemy of the state."

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Kind of hard to rule from a jail cell, and I'm guessing that he'd have died of old age by the time something like this was ruled on, regardless. I say, go out with a legacy of giving the court (and the GOP) what they deserve.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Will no one rid me of this turbulent "justice"?

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah... they are impeaching him.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

With the Republicans holding the House? Lmao

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Didn't say it would work.

[-] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Who held the House during Trumps impeachments? I honestly don't remember, but I guess I'm assuming it was the Democrats.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

It was, and even if they had a slim majority it doesn't matter. To actually remove a Justice they'd need a 2/3 vote supermajority in the Senate.

[-] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Thanks. Yeah it's not going to happen, sadly.

(And thank you for not harping on whatever the hell that autocorrect error was lol holy hell)

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I'm not going to hold my breath.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
817 points (96.8% liked)

News

23388 readers
1749 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS