43
submitted 4 months ago by Brickardo@feddit.nl to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Hi everyone,

I've been checking this forum but I have not managed to find duplicates (I'm using Summit for Lemmy). If that's the case I'll remove this post.

I'm about to start a PhD. I've been told I will be required to partake in publications and other shenanigans. I am not against it, but I'm very concerned about having my full name flying around the internet, as I've always been hesitant of sharing any of that information (real name, pictures, etc).

Ultimately, I only care for potential employers to know that it's actually me the one who has written this or that, which I would happily disclose in private.

What's the usual stance in this situation?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 months ago

Yep, part of evaluating a work is knowing whose work it is. I'll read a paper on, say, lung cancer by SirTobaccoLobbyist differently than one by DrCancerResearcher. If I don't know whose work it is, it's very hard to contextualize.

[-] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

In fact anonymous review is an important part of the scientific method, precisely because work shouldn’t be judged by its source

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
43 points (95.7% liked)

Privacy

32165 readers
381 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS